Cottrell v. Cordis Corporation et al

Filing 39

ORDER GRANTING 38 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant Cordis Corporation to Respond to 36 Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on July 5, 2016. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2016)

Case 4:16-cv-02500-JSW Document 38-1 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

CROWELL & MORING LLP
Kevin C. Mayer (CSB No. 118177)
E-mail: [e-mail]
275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.986.2827
Andrew D. Kaplan (Appearance pro hac vice)
E-mail: [e-mail]
Rebecca B. Chaney (Appearance pro hac vice)
E-mail: [e-mail]
1001 Pennsylvania Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202.628.5116
Attorneys for Defendant Cordis Corporation
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

OAKLAND DIVISION

13
14
15

DEANNA COTTRELL
Plaintiff,

16
17
18
19
20

v.
CORDIS CORPORATION, and
JOHNSON & JOHNSON,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:16-CV-02500-JSW
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT CORDIS CORPORATION
TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT

The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
Complaint Filed: June 21, 2016

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-02500-JSW

Case 4:16-cv-02500-JSW Document 38-1 Filed 07/01/16 Page 2 of 2

1

WHEREAS, the hearing on Plaintiff Deanna Cottrell’s (“Cottrell) Motion to Remand is

2

set for hearing on August 12, 2016, Cottrell and defendant Cordis Corporation (“Cordis”) have

3

stipulated to extend the time Cordis has to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff’s First

4

Amended Complaint until fourteen (14) days after the Court rules on the jurisdictional/remand

5

issue.

6

WHEREAS, this extension will not alter any event or deadline set in any Court order.

7

For these reasons, and for good cause shown, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Cordis’

8

request to extend its time to answer or respond to plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint until

9

fourteen (14) days after the Court has ruled on the jurisdictional/remand issue is granted.

10
11
12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.
July 5
Dated: _________________, 2016.

____________________________________
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-02500-JSW