Velasquez v. Ndoh

Filing 4

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Clerk of the Court shall serve a Magistrate Judge jurisdiction consent form, a copy of this Order, as well as the petition and all attachments thereto upon Respondent and Respondent's attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California. Defendant's consent or declination to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge due by 7/25/2016. Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 8/26/2016. S igned by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 06/27/2016. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 EDGAR ENRIQUE VELASQUEZ, Case No. 16-cv-02666-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 10 ROSEMARY NDOH, Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Petitioner Edgar Enrique Velasquez, a state prisoner, has filed this petition for a writ of 13 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This action has been assigned to the undersigned 14 Magistrate Judge. 15 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), with written consent of all parties, a magistrate judge may 16 conduct all proceedings in a case, including entry of judgment. Appeal will be directly to the 17 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(3). 18 19 On June 13, 2016, Petitioner consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction in this matter. [Docket No. 3.] 20 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 21 It does not appear from the face of the petition that it is without merit. Good cause 22 23 appearing, the court hereby issues the following orders: 1. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a Magistrate Judge jurisdiction consent form, a 24 copy of this Order, as well as the petition and all attachments thereto upon Respondent and 25 Respondent’s attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California. 26 2. Within twenty-eight (28) days of the issuance of this Order, Respondent shall 27 complete and file the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction consent form to indicate whether he/she 28 consents or declines to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge. Respondent is free to 1 withhold consent without adverse consequences. If Respondent consents to a Magistrate Judge’s 2 jurisdiction, this case will be handled by the undersigned Magistrate Judge. If Respondent 3 declines, the case will be reassigned to a District Judge. Whether Respondent consents or declines 4 to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties shall abide by the briefing schedule 5 below. 6 3. Respondent shall file with this court and serve upon Petitioner, within sixty (60) days of the issuance of this Order, an Answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules 8 Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be issued. 9 Respondent shall file with the Answer a copy of all portions of the relevant state records that have 10 been transcribed previously and that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 7 petition. 12 4. If Petitioner wishes to respond to the Answer, he shall do so by filing a Traverse 13 with the court and serving it on Respondent within twenty-eight (28) days of his receipt of the 14 Answer. Should Petitioner fail to do so, the petition will be deemed submitted and ready for 15 decision twenty-eight (28) days after the date Petitioner is served with Respondent’s Answer. 16 5. Respondent may file with this court and serve upon Petitioner, within sixty (60) 17 days of the issuance of this Order, a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an 18 Answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 19 2254 Cases. If Respondent files a motion to dismiss, Petitioner shall file with the court and serve 20 on Respondent an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-eight 21 (28) days of receipt of the motion, and Respondent shall file with the court and serve on Petitioner 22 a reply within fourteen (14) days of receipt of any opposition. 23 6. It is Petitioner’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Petitioner must keep the 24 court and Respondent informed of any change of address and must comply with the court’s orders 25 in a timely fashion. Petitioner must also serve on Respondent’s counsel all communications with 26 the court by mailing a true copy of the document to Respondent’s counsel. 27 28 7. Extensions of time are not favored, though reasonable extensions will be granted. Any motion for an extension of time must be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the 2 2 ER H 7 8 9 10 11 United States District Court Northern District of California FO RT 6 u ______________________________________ a M. Ry e Donn Judg Donna M. Ryu United States Magistrate Judge NO 5 Dated: June 27, 2016 I LI 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 A 3 ERED ORD T IS SO R NIA UNIT ED S deadline sought to be extended. RT U O 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?