Securities and Exchange Commission v. JSG Capital Investments, LLC et al

Filing 32

RELATED CASE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/10/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 13 RELATED CASE ORDER v. Re: Dkt. No. 3 JASWANT SINGH GILL a/k/a JASON GILL, and JAVIER CARLOS RIOS, 11 12 Case No. 16-cr-00219-JSW Defendants. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, 14 v. Case No. 16-cv-02814-JSW RELATED CASE ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 29 15 16 JSG CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, LLC, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 In Securities and Exchange Commission v. JSG Capital Investments, LLC, et al., No. 20 16-cv-02814-JSW, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed an administrative 21 motion to consider whether the above-captioned cases should be related under Civil Local Rule 22 3-12(b) and Criminal Local Rule 8-1(a). Plaintiff SEC also filed a notice of related cases in 23 United States v. Gill, et al., No. 16-cr-219-JSW. 24 The time for filing a statement to support or oppose the motion and notice has passed. On 25 the basis of the material submitted to the Court, and upon review of the record, the Court finds that 26 the cases ARE RELATED as defined by Civil Local Rule 3-12 and Criminal Local Rule 8-1. 27 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the motion to consider whether the cases are related. 28 Because both cases are already assigned to the undersigned, however, further reassignment 1 2 3 is not necessary n y. IT IS SO ORDER S RED. Da ated: June 10 2016 0, 4 5 JE EFFREY S. W WHITE Un nited States D District Judge g 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?