Burnthorne-Martinez v. Sephora USA, Inc.
Filing
68
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CONTINUING JULY 11, 2017 HEARING re 67 Stipulation and Proposed Order filed by Alyssa Burnthorne-Martinez, Sephora USA, Inc. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/20/17. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
ANDREW R. LIVINGSTON (STATE BAR NO. 148646)
alivingston@orrick.com
ALEXANDRA HEIFETZ (STATE BAR NO. 301002)
aheifetz@orrick.com
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
Telephone:
+1 415 773 5700
Facsimile:
+1 415 773 5759
6
Attorneys for Defendant
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
ALYSSA BURNTHORNE-MARTINEZ, an
individual on behalf of herself, all others
similarly situated,
Case No. 4:16-cv-02843-YGR
CLASS ACTION
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING JULY 11, 2017
HEARING
15
16
17
18
SEPHORA USA, INC., a Delaware
Corporation, and DOES 1 to 100, Inclusive,
Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
Defendants.
Judge:
July 11, 2017
2:00 p.m.
Ronald V. Dellums Federal
Building, Oakland in
Courtroom 1, 4th Floor
Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONT. JULY 11, 2017 HEARING
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-02843-YGR
1
STIPULATION
2
The motion for class certification brought by Plaintiff Alyssa Burnthorne-Martinez, and
3
the motion for summary judgment (or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment) brought by
4
Defendant Sephora USA, Inc., are fully briefed, with a hearing on both motions currently set for
5
July 11, 2017. See Dkt. Nos. 48, 49, 54, 56, 60, 61, 65. The hearing was initially scheduled for
6
April 4, 2017, but the Court granted a continuance to afford the parties the opportunity to
7
mediate. Dkt. No. 65; Mar. 23, 2017 Minute Entry. The parties participated in a full day of
8
mediation with Michael Dickstein, an experienced employment law mediator, on May 18, 2017.
9
As the parties reported to the Court during a conference on May 30, 2017, the case did not settle
10
at the mediation. Since then, the parties have continued to negotiate a potential settlement of the
11
case, working through Mr. Dickstein. The parties believe that continued settlement talks may be
12
fruitful, and that further time is necessary so that they may attempt to reach a resolution of the
13
case.
14
///
15
///
16
///
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
-1-
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONT. JULY 11, 2017 HEARING
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-02843-YGR
1
Accordingly, and to give the parties the opportunity to further pursue a negotiated
2
resolution of the case, the parties hereby stipulate that the hearings on Plaintiff’s motion for class
3
certification and Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (or, in the alternative, partial
4
summary judgment) be continued to August 15, 2017. The parties respectfully request that the
5
Court enter an order to this effect.
6
7
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: June 19, 2017
SETAREH LAW GROUP
8
By:
9
/s/ Shaun Setareh
SHAUN SETAREH
Attorneys for Plaintiff
10
11
Dated: June 19, 2017
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
12
13
14
By:
/s/ Andrew R. Livingston
ANDREW R. LIVINGSTON
Attorneys for Defendant Sephora USA, Inc.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONT.
JULY 11, 2017 HEARING
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-02843-YGR
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, the Court hereby orders, in order to allow the parties sufficient
3
time to pursue mediation, that the hearings on Plaintiff’s motion for class certification (Dkt. No.
4
48) and Sephora’s motion for summary judgment (or, in the alternative, partial summary
5
judgment) (Dkt. No. 49) are both hereby continued to August 15, 2017. All pretrial dates, and
6
the trial date, remain unchanged.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: __________________
June 20, 2017
10
11
12
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONT.
JULY 11, 2017 HEARING
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-02843-YGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?