Gray v. Lewis et al

Filing 3

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Certificate of Service Attached) Show Cause Response due by 6/29/2016. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/3/16. (napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RICKY GRAY, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 16-cv-02863-PJH ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. J. LEWIS, et al., Defendants. 12 13 14 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 15 The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”), provides that a prisoner may 16 not bring a civil action or appeal a civil judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner 17 has, on three or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, 18 brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the 19 grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be 20 granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 21 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The phrase “fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” as 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 used in § 1915(g), “parallels the language of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).” Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1121 (9th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted). A case is “frivolous” within the meaning of § 1915(g) if “it is of little weight or importance: having no basis in law or fact.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). The court may count as strikes dismissals of district court cases as well as dismissals of appeals. See Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1178 (9th Cir. 1999) (prisoner does not get three frivolous claims and three frivolous appeals before being barred by § 1915(g)). A 1 dis smissal und § 1915(g means th a prison cannot proceed wi his actio as a der g) hat ner ith on 2 pauper under § 1915(g), but he still may pursu his claim if he pays the full filin fee at r , l ue m s ng 3 the outset of the action. e t It appe ears that pla aintiff has at least thre strikes pu a ee ursuant to § 1915(g): 4 i. . Gray v. Gomez No. 96-5106 (E.D. C April 9, 1996), dismissed as y z, Cal. , frivo olous. ii. . Gray v. Doyle, No. 02-266 (C.D. Ca April 9, 2 y 67 al. 2002), dism missed as frivo olous. iii. . Gray v. Palmer No. 04-83 (C.D. C Nov. 4, 2004), dis y r, 354 Cal. , smissed for failu to state a claim.1 ure iv. . 5 Gray v. Cogdell, No. 09-2 y 2624 (N.D. C Oct. 21 2009), di Cal. 1, ismissed for failure to sta a claim , affirmed o appeal in Gray v. C f ate on n Cogdell, No. 09-1 17454 (9th Cir. Dec. 27, 2010). 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Plaintif shall show cause by June 29, 2 ff w y 2016, why t this case should not b deemed be thr strikes barred and the applica ree b ation to proc ceed in form pauperi denied. Failure to ma is rep will resu in dismis ply ult ssal. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDER S RED. Da ated: June 3, 2016 3 16 17 18 PH HYLLIS J. H HAMILTON N Un nited States District Ju s udge 19 20 \\can ndoak.cand.circ9 9.dcn\data\users\PJHALL\_psp\2 2016\2016_02863 3_Gray_v_Lewis s_(PSP)\16-cv-02 2863-PJH-osc-p.docx 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 The Ninth Circuit revok plaintiff’ in forma pauperis st T ked ’s tatus on ap ppeal after f finding that he had three strikes relying on the first three c f cases discu ussed above Gray v. Zargoza, e. No 10-55983 (9th Cir. Sep. 14, 201 o. 3 S 10). 2 1 UNITED STATES D DISTRICT C COURT 2 NORTHER DISTRIC OF CAL N RN CT LIFORNIA 3 4 RICKY GRA R AY, Case No. 16-cv-028 863-PJH Plaintiff, 5 v. CERTIFIC CATE OF S SERVICE 6 7 J. LEWIS, et al., . t Defendants. 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 I, the undersigned hereby ce u d, ertify that I am an emp ployee in th Office of the Clerk, he f S. C hern Distric of Californ ct nia. U.S District Court, North That on June 3, 2016, I SER 2 RVED a true and corre copy(ies of the atta e ect s) ached, by pla acing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelo addres c ope ssed to the person(s) h hereinafter list ted, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing sa copy(ies into an d y aid s) inte er-office de elivery receptacle locat in the C ted Clerk's office. 15 16 17 18 Ric cky Gray ID C-32622 D: 2 2-A A3-04 Co orcoran State Prison P. O. Box 715 5071 -2-A3-04 Re epresa, CA 95671 19 20 ated: June 3, 2016 3 Da 21 22 23 Susan Y. So oong Clerk, United States Dis d strict Court C 24 25 26 y:________ _________ _________ By Nichole Peric Deputy C c, Clerk to the e Honorable P PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON N 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?