Pierotti v. Regents of the University of California

Filing 61

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 60 Motion to Shorten Time to Hear Defendant's 59 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DANIELLE OCHS, CA Bar No. 178677 danielle.ochs@ogletree.com RACHEL J. MOROSKI, CA Bar No. 286805 rachel.moroski@ogletree.com ANNA L. PADGETT, CA Bar No. 307146 anna.padgett@ogletree.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 One Market Plaza San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415.442.4810 Facsimile: 415.442.4870 Attorneys for Defendant THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA EXEMPT FROM FEES, GOV. CODE § 6103 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 DIANE PIEROTTI, Case No. 16-cv-02936-HSG 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME TO HEAR DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF 17 CALIFORNIA and DOES 1-10, 18 Defendants. First Amended Complaint Filed: August 29, 2017 Complaint Filed: June 1, 2016 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 16-cv-02936-HSG ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME TO HEAR DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 Having considered Defendant’s Motion for an Order Sh D hortening Tim to Hear D me Defendant’s 2 Mot tion for Part Summary Judgment, the Court h tial y hereby rules t the Mot that tion for an O Order 3 Sho ortening Tim is DENIED me D. 4 IT IS SO ORDERE O ED. 5 6 7 Dat ted: Decem mber 29, 2017 7 The Ho Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. on. d m, United States Distr Court Ju d rict udge 8 9 10 11 32460022.1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 16-cv-02936-HSG G 1 OR RDER DENYI ING DEFENDA ANT’S MOTION FOR ORD DER SHORTEN NING TIME T HEAR DEF TO FENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SU M R UMMARY JU UDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?