Pierotti v. Regents of the University of California
Filing
61
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 60 Motion to Shorten Time to Hear Defendant's 59 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DANIELLE OCHS, CA Bar No. 178677
danielle.ochs@ogletree.com
RACHEL J. MOROSKI, CA Bar No. 286805
rachel.moroski@ogletree.com
ANNA L. PADGETT, CA Bar No. 307146
anna.padgett@ogletree.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.442.4810
Facsimile:
415.442.4870
Attorneys for Defendant
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
EXEMPT FROM FEES, GOV. CODE § 6103
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
DIANE PIEROTTI,
Case No. 16-cv-02936-HSG
14
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING
TIME TO HEAR DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
17 CALIFORNIA and DOES 1-10,
18
Defendants.
First Amended Complaint Filed:
August 29, 2017
Complaint Filed: June 1, 2016
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 16-cv-02936-HSG
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME TO HEAR DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
1
Having considered Defendant’s Motion for an Order Sh
D
hortening Tim to Hear D
me
Defendant’s
2
Mot
tion for Part Summary Judgment, the Court h
tial
y
hereby rules t the Mot
that
tion for an O
Order
3
Sho
ortening Tim is DENIED
me
D.
4
IT IS SO ORDERE
O
ED.
5
6
7
Dat
ted: Decem
mber 29, 2017
7
The Ho Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.
on.
d
m,
United States Distr Court Ju
d
rict
udge
8
9
10
11
32460022.1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 16-cv-02936-HSG
G
1
OR
RDER DENYI
ING DEFENDA
ANT’S MOTION FOR ORD
DER SHORTEN
NING TIME T HEAR DEF
TO
FENDANT’S
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SU
M
R
UMMARY JU
UDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?