Bell v. Arnold
Filing
4
ORDER FOR PETITIONER TO SHOW CAUSE. (Certificate of Service Attached). Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 6/28/16. (napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JOSEPH BELL,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 16-cv-03034-PJH
ORDER FOR PETITIONER TO SHOW
CAUSE
v.
ERIC ARNOLD,
Defendant.
12
13
Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus
14
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has paid the filing fee. Petitioner challenges a
15
November 8, 1996, conviction from the San Francisco County Superior Court. Petitioner
16
argues that he received an unauthorized sentence in excess of the trial court’s jurisdiction
17
because of state Propositions that were passed in 1990 before his trial and sentence.
18
However, court records indicate that petitioner already filed a habeas petition in this court
19
challenging the same conviction. See Bell v. Lamarque, Case No. 99-cv-3562-PJH.
20
That case was denied on June 20, 2003, and an appeal was later denied. This appears
21
to be a successive petition.
22
“A claim presented in a second or successive habeas corpus application under
23
section 2254 that was not presented in a prior application shall be dismissed . . .” 28
24
U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2). This is the case unless,
25
26
27
28
(A) the applicant shows that the claim relies on a new
rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on
collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously
unavailable; or
(B) (i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have
been discovered previously through the exercise of due
diligence; and
1
2
3
(ii) the facts un
t
nderlying th claim, if proven and viewed
he
d
in light of the eviden
nce as a w
whole, wou be suff
uld
ficient to
establish by clear and convin
a
ncing evide
ence that, but for
constitution
nal error, no reason
nable factf
finder wou
uld have
found the applicant gu of the u
a
uilty
underlying offense.
28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2).
2
4
“Before a second or successive application permitted by this sec
s
s
n
ction is filed
5
in the district court, the applicant sh move in the appropriate cour of appeals for an
t
a
hall
n
rt
s
6
ord authoriz
der
zing the dis
strict court to consider the applica
o
ation.” 28 U
U.S.C. §
7
2244(b)(3)(A) It does not appear that petition has rece
).
ner
eived autho
orization fro the
om
8
Nin Circuit to file this petition, therefore he w be order to show cause why this case
nth
t
p
will
red
w
y
9
sho
ould not be dismissed. Petitioner must show cause by July 29, 2
e
w
y
2016, why t
this case
10
sho
ould not be dismissed as successive. Failure to file a response w result in dismissal.
e
will
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
12
Da
ated: June 28, 2016
2
13
14
15
PH
HYLLIS J. H
HAMILTON
N
Un
nited States District Ju
s
udge
16
17
\\can
ndoak.cand.circ9
9.dcn\data\users\PJHALL\_psp\2
2016\2016_03034
4_Bell_v_Arnold
d_(PSP)\16-cv-03
3034-PJH-osc-p.
.docx
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES D
DISTRICT C
COURT
2
NORTHER DISTRIC OF CAL
N
RN
CT
LIFORNIA
3
4
JO
OSEPH BE
ELL,
Case No. 16-cv-030
034-PJH
Plaintiff,
5
v.
CERTIFIC
CATE OF S
SERVICE
6
7
ERIC ARNO
OLD,
Defendant.
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
I, the undersigned hereby ce
u
d,
ertify that I am an emp
ployee in th Office of the Clerk,
he
f
S.
C
hern Distric of Californ
ct
nia.
U.S District Court, North
That on June 28, 2016, I SERVED a tru and corr
ue
rect copy(ie of the at
es)
ttached, by
pla
acing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelo addres
c
ope
ssed to the person(s) h
hereinafter
list
ted, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing sa copy(ies into an
d
y
aid
s)
inte
er-office de
elivery receptacle locat in the C
ted
Clerk's office.
15
16
17
Jos
seph Bell
K-3
30059
P.O Box 4000
O.
Va
acaville, CA 95696
A
18
19
20
ated: June 28, 2016
2
Da
21
22
Susan Y. So
oong
Clerk, United States Dis
d
strict Court
C
23
24
25
y:________
_________
_________
By
Nichole Peric Deputy C
c,
Clerk to the
e
Honorable P
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
N
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?