Oehring et al v. Cordis Corporation et al

Filing 32

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' SUMMARIES OF ARGUMENT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 7/8/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT

5

NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA

6
7

LI
ISA OEHRI
ING, et al.,

8

Plaintiffs,

9
10
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 1
16-cv-03088
8-JSW
ORDER R
REGARDIN PLAINT
NG
TIFFS'
SUMMAR
RIES OF AR
RGUMENT
T

v.
CORDIS COR
RPORATIO et al.,
ON,

Re: Dkt. N 20-1, 27-1, 31-1
Nos.

Defendants
s.

12
13

Plaintif have filed a motion to remand and their oppo
ffs
d
o
d
ositions to the motions to dismiss.
e
o

14

Pla
aintiffs have submitted separate summaries of ar
rgument in su
upport of ea of these m
ach
motions.

15

This Court’s Civil Standing Orders pro
C
g
ovide that “[b
b]riefs excee
eding ten pa
ages in length must
h

16

con
ntain an addi
itional one-p
page summar of argume includin reference to any impo
ry
ent,
ng
ortant cases

17

cite
ed.” (Civil Standing Ord ¶ 7.) Th Court issu this Orde to advise a parties that this
S
der
he
ues
er
all

18

sum
mmary shoul be contain within th brief itsel and must b limited to one page. T Court
ld
ned
he
lf
be
o
The

19

doe not includ the norma page limita
es
de
al
ations for m
motions. Alth
hough Plaint
tiffs’ summa
aries do not

20

com
mply with th Court’s standing order it shall not strike them However, if any party files a
he
r,
t
m.
,
y

21

sum
mmary of arg
gument that is not includ within a brief and ex
ded
xceeds one p
page, the Cou shall
urt

22

stri that docu
ike
ument and will not consi
w
ider it.

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: July 8, 2016
2
___
__________
___________
__________
________
JEF
FFREY S. W
WHITE
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge