Rodriguez v. Akima Infrastructure Services, LLC et al

Filing 99

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/25/2019. (pjhlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2019)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

SARAH RODRIGUEZ,

9
10
11

Case No. 16-cv-03607-PJH

Plaintiff,

8
v.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

AKIMA INFRASTRUCTURE
SERVICES, LLC,

Re: Dkt. No. 98

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendant.
12
13
14

The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have

15

reached a settlement in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed

16

without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court,

17

within sixty days, with proof of service thereof on the opposing party, that the agreed

18

consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall

19

stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.

20

If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty days, the dismissal shall be with

21

prejudice. The parties may, of course, substitute a dismissal with prejudice at any time

22

during this sixty day period. The December 9, 2019 trial date is VACATED.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

Dated: November 25, 2019

25
26
27
28

/s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge