Han et al v. Synergy Homecare Franchising, LLC
Filing
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 25 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Synergy Homecare Franchising, LLC filed by Synergy Homecare Franchising, LLC, Case referred to mediation.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 9/21/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
John Han, Alice Lai-Bitker & Veris
Eastay Homecare, Inc.
Plaintiff(s)
CASE No C 4:16-cv-03759-KAW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
v.
Synergy Homecare Franchising,
LLC,
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
El Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[21 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
0 Private ADR (specify process and provider)
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
12 the presumptive deadline (90 days from the dale of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered. )
0 other requested deadline:
AA,c‘r----(F14 'cif mit.e5Teme)
ey for laintiffs
Date: September 13, 2016
Date: September 13, 2016
efendant
Uzcox.ii Cc-
X
u IT IS SO ORDERED
O IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
Date: 9/21/16
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: "Stipulation & Proposed Order
Selecting Mediation" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting
Private ADR."
Form ADR-Stip rev. 7-2016
Anseriesn LegalNet, Ine.
whallannsHodilumson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?