Han et al v. Synergy Homecare Franchising, LLC

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 25 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Synergy Homecare Franchising, LLC filed by Synergy Homecare Franchising, LLC, Case referred to mediation.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 9/21/16. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2016)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA John Han, Alice Lai-Bitker & Veris Eastay Homecare, Inc. Plaintiff(s) CASE No C 4:16-cv-03759-KAW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS v. Synergy Homecare Franchising, LLC, Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: El Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) [21 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) 0 Private ADR (specify process and provider) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 12 the presumptive deadline (90 days from the dale of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) 0 other requested deadline: AA,c‘r----(F14 'cif mit.e5Teme) ey for laintiffs Date: September 13, 2016 Date: September 13, 2016 efendant Uzcox.ii Cc- X u IT IS SO ORDERED O IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: 9/21/16 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR." Form ADR-Stip rev. 7-2016 Anseriesn LegalNet, Ine. whallannsHodilumson

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?