Mysfyt, Inc. v. James Lum

Filing 43

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS re 42 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Stay Pending Settlement filed by MYSFYT, Inc., James Lum. Case Management Statement due by 7/25/2017. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/1/2017 at 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 6/20/17. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DOMINIC V. SIGNOROTTI, CA Bar No. 267712 dsignorotti@bpbsllp.com BUCHMAN PROVINE BROTHERS SMITH LLP 2033 N. Main Street, Suite 720 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Telephone: 925 944 9700 Facsimile: 925 944 9701 Attorneys for Plaintiff 10 OTTO O. LEE, CA Bar No. 173987 olee@iplg.com KEVIN VIAU, CA Bar No. 275556 kviau@iplg.com INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP 12 South First Street, 12th Floor San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: (408) 286-8933 Facsimile: (408) 286-8932 11 Attorneys for Defendant 7 8 9 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 OAKLAND DIVISION 15 16 17 MYSFYT, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, 18 v. 19 Case No.: 16-CV-03813-KAW STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING SETTLEMENT; [PROPOSED] ORDER JAMES LUM, an individual, 20 Defendant/Counterclaimant. 21 22 WHEREAS, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Mysfyt, Inc. (“Plaintiff” and “Mysfyt”) and 23 Defendant/Counterclaimant James Lum (“Defendant” and “Lum”) (collectively the “Parties”) have 24 reached an agreement in principle for a settlement of this action; 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the Parties are continuing the process of finalizing a written settlement agreement; WHEREAS, the Parties twice previously stipulated to stay proceedings for settlement (Dkt. Nos. 38 and 40), and the Court ordered such stays (Dkt. Nos. 39 and 41). Stipulation to Stay Proceedings Pending Settlement 1 16-CV-03813-KAW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS, the Parties require additional time to finalize a full settlement, and anticipate the process to finalize settlement will be completed within thirty (30) days; WHEREAS, a Further Case Management Conference is scheduled to take place on June 27, 2017 at 1:30pm, with a Further Case Management Statement due June 20, 2017. WHEREAS, the Parties believe full settlement is very imminent, and wish not to burden the Court with unnecessary proceedings while the settlement process is completed. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the 8 Parties, through their undersigned counsel, that the action be stayed for an additional period of thirty 9 (30) days pending the finalization of the settlement agreement, and that the Further Case 10 Management Conference scheduled on the Court’s June 27, 2017 calendar be moved to August 1, 11 2017, with the Further Case Management Statement to be filed by July 25, 2017. 12 IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. 13 Respectfully submitted, 14 15 Dated: June 19, 2017 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP By: /s/ Otto O. Lee Otto O. Lee Kevin Viau 12 South First Street, 12th Floor San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: (408) 286-8933 Facsimile: (408) 286-8932 16 17 18 19 Attorneys for Defendant 20 21 22 23 24 25 Dated: June 19, 2017 BUCHMAN PROVINE BROTHERS SMITH LLP By: /s/ Dominic V. Singrotti Dominic V. Signorotti 2033 N. Main Street, Suite 720 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Telephone: 925 944 9700 Facsimile: 925 944 9701 Attorneys for Plaintiff 26 27 28 * * Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), filing counsel attests that all other signatories listed, on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing. Stipulation to Stay Proceedings Pending Settlement 2 16-CV-03813-KAW [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 Dated: 6/20/17 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation to Stay Proceedings Pending Settlement 3 16-CV-03813-KAW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?