Mysfyt, Inc. v. James Lum
Filing
43
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS re 42 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Stay Pending Settlement filed by MYSFYT, Inc., James Lum. Case Management Statement due by 7/25/2017. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/1/2017 at 01:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 6/20/17. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
DOMINIC V. SIGNOROTTI, CA Bar No. 267712
dsignorotti@bpbsllp.com
BUCHMAN PROVINE BROTHERS SMITH LLP
2033 N. Main Street, Suite 720
Walnut Creek, California 94596
Telephone: 925 944 9700
Facsimile: 925 944 9701
Attorneys for Plaintiff
10
OTTO O. LEE, CA Bar No. 173987
olee@iplg.com
KEVIN VIAU, CA Bar No. 275556
kviau@iplg.com
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP
12 South First Street, 12th Floor
San Jose, California 95113
Telephone: (408) 286-8933
Facsimile: (408) 286-8932
11
Attorneys for Defendant
7
8
9
12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
OAKLAND DIVISION
15
16
17
MYSFYT, INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant,
18
v.
19
Case No.: 16-CV-03813-KAW
STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
PENDING SETTLEMENT;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
JAMES LUM, an individual,
20
Defendant/Counterclaimant.
21
22
WHEREAS, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Mysfyt, Inc. (“Plaintiff” and “Mysfyt”) and
23
Defendant/Counterclaimant James Lum (“Defendant” and “Lum”) (collectively the “Parties”) have
24
reached an agreement in principle for a settlement of this action;
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, the Parties are continuing the process of finalizing a written settlement
agreement;
WHEREAS, the Parties twice previously stipulated to stay proceedings for settlement (Dkt.
Nos. 38 and 40), and the Court ordered such stays (Dkt. Nos. 39 and 41).
Stipulation to Stay Proceedings Pending Settlement
1
16-CV-03813-KAW
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
WHEREAS, the Parties require additional time to finalize a full settlement, and anticipate
the process to finalize settlement will be completed within thirty (30) days;
WHEREAS, a Further Case Management Conference is scheduled to take place on June 27,
2017 at 1:30pm, with a Further Case Management Statement due June 20, 2017.
WHEREAS, the Parties believe full settlement is very imminent, and wish not to burden the
Court with unnecessary proceedings while the settlement process is completed.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the
8
Parties, through their undersigned counsel, that the action be stayed for an additional period of thirty
9
(30) days pending the finalization of the settlement agreement, and that the Further Case
10
Management Conference scheduled on the Court’s June 27, 2017 calendar be moved to August 1,
11
2017, with the Further Case Management Statement to be filed by July 25, 2017.
12
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
13
Respectfully submitted,
14
15
Dated: June 19, 2017
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP
By: /s/ Otto O. Lee
Otto O. Lee
Kevin Viau
12 South First Street, 12th Floor
San Jose, California 95113
Telephone: (408) 286-8933
Facsimile: (408) 286-8932
16
17
18
19
Attorneys for Defendant
20
21
22
23
24
25
Dated: June 19, 2017
BUCHMAN PROVINE BROTHERS SMITH LLP
By: /s/ Dominic V. Singrotti
Dominic V. Signorotti
2033 N. Main Street, Suite 720
Walnut Creek, California 94596
Telephone: 925 944 9700
Facsimile: 925 944 9701
Attorneys for Plaintiff
26
27
28
*
* Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), filing counsel attests that all other signatories listed, on whose
behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.
Stipulation to Stay Proceedings Pending Settlement
2
16-CV-03813-KAW
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
Dated:
6/20/17
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation to Stay Proceedings Pending Settlement
3
16-CV-03813-KAW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?