Barnard v. CorePower Yoga LLC
Filing
47
JUDGMENT. ***Civil Case Terminated.***Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 4/27/18. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
SHAUNA BARNARD, an individual, on
behalf of herself and all others similarly
situated, all other aggrieved employees, and on
behalf of the general public,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
19
Case No. 4:16-cv-03861 (HSG)
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
Courtroom: 2 – Oakland Courthouse, 4th Fl.
CLASS ACTION
FINAL JUDGMENT
v.
COREPOWER YOGA LLC, a Colorado
Limited Liability Company, and DOES 1
through 50, Inclusive,
Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FINAL JUDGMENT 4:16-CV-03861-HSG
462600.02-PALSR01A - MSW
1
Having reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect to Plaintiff’s Motion
2
for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement (Dkt. No. 42) and Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees and
3
Costs (Dkt. No. 40), along with the oral argument presented during the final fairness hearing held
4
on February 15, 2018, the Court Granted final approval and granted in part Plaintiff’s Motion for
5
Fees and Costs, collectively in an Order entered February 21, 2018 (Dkt. No. 45) and now enters
6
Judgment as follows:
7
1.
In accordance with Rule 23(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the
8
requirements of due process, all members of the Settlement Class have been given proper and
9
adequate notice of the Settlement.
10
2.
The Agreement has been granted final approval pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the
11
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because it is fair, adequate, and reasonable to those it affects; it
12
resulted from vigorously contested litigation, discovery and motion practice and extensive good-
13
faith, arm’s length negotiations between the parties; and it is in the public interest. (Dkt. No. 45);
14
15
3.
The Parties to the Agreement are directed to consummate the Agreement in
accordance with its terms.
16
4.
The Court approved the settlement amount of $1,400,000, including payments of
17
attorneys’ fees in the amount of $420,000; costs in the amount of $19,864.77; claims
18
administration fees in the amount of $12,878; and an incentive fee for the named Plaintiff in the
19
amount of $8,000 (Dkt. No. 45).
20
5.
The Litigation as between the Named Plaintiff and the Settlement Class Members
21
on the one hand, and CorePower Yoga on the other hand, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
22
and without costs to any Party , other than as specified in the Agreement and Order (Dkt. No.
23
45).
24
6.
In consideration of the Class Settlement Amount, and for other good and valuable
25
consideration, each of the participating Settlement Class Members shall, by operation of this
26
Judgment, have fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged all settled
27
claims against CorePower Yoga in accordance with Sections 22, 23 and 53 of the Agreement.
28
FINAL JUDGMENT 4:16-CV-03861-HSG
462600.02-PALSR01A - MSW
1
2
3
7.
This Judgement is the Final Judgment in the suit as to all Settlement Class
Members’ Released Claims.
8.
Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court retains
4
jurisdiction over (a) implementation of the Settlement and the terms of the Agreement; (b)
5
distribution of the Settlement to the Class, Class Counsel, the Class Representative, and the
6
Administrator; and (c) all other proceedings related to the implementation, interpretation,
7
administration, consummation, and enforcement of the terms of the Agreement and the
8
Settlement, and the administration of Claims submitted by Settlement Class Members. The time
9
to appeal from this Judgment shall commence upon its entry.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated: April 27, 2018
_________________________________
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
13
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2FINAL JUDGMENT 4:16-CV-03861-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?