Barnard v. CorePower Yoga LLC

Filing 47

JUDGMENT. ***Civil Case Terminated.***Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 4/27/18. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 SHAUNA BARNARD, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, all other aggrieved employees, and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiff, 15 16 17 18 19 Case No. 4:16-cv-03861 (HSG) HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. Courtroom: 2 – Oakland Courthouse, 4th Fl. CLASS ACTION FINAL JUDGMENT v. COREPOWER YOGA LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive, Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FINAL JUDGMENT 4:16-CV-03861-HSG 462600.02-PALSR01A - MSW 1 Having reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect to Plaintiff’s Motion 2 for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement (Dkt. No. 42) and Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees and 3 Costs (Dkt. No. 40), along with the oral argument presented during the final fairness hearing held 4 on February 15, 2018, the Court Granted final approval and granted in part Plaintiff’s Motion for 5 Fees and Costs, collectively in an Order entered February 21, 2018 (Dkt. No. 45) and now enters 6 Judgment as follows: 7 1. In accordance with Rule 23(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the 8 requirements of due process, all members of the Settlement Class have been given proper and 9 adequate notice of the Settlement. 10 2. The Agreement has been granted final approval pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the 11 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because it is fair, adequate, and reasonable to those it affects; it 12 resulted from vigorously contested litigation, discovery and motion practice and extensive good- 13 faith, arm’s length negotiations between the parties; and it is in the public interest. (Dkt. No. 45); 14 15 3. The Parties to the Agreement are directed to consummate the Agreement in accordance with its terms. 16 4. The Court approved the settlement amount of $1,400,000, including payments of 17 attorneys’ fees in the amount of $420,000; costs in the amount of $19,864.77; claims 18 administration fees in the amount of $12,878; and an incentive fee for the named Plaintiff in the 19 amount of $8,000 (Dkt. No. 45). 20 5. The Litigation as between the Named Plaintiff and the Settlement Class Members 21 on the one hand, and CorePower Yoga on the other hand, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE 22 and without costs to any Party , other than as specified in the Agreement and Order (Dkt. No. 23 45). 24 6. In consideration of the Class Settlement Amount, and for other good and valuable 25 consideration, each of the participating Settlement Class Members shall, by operation of this 26 Judgment, have fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged all settled 27 claims against CorePower Yoga in accordance with Sections 22, 23 and 53 of the Agreement. 28 FINAL JUDGMENT 4:16-CV-03861-HSG 462600.02-PALSR01A - MSW 1 2 3 7. This Judgement is the Final Judgment in the suit as to all Settlement Class Members’ Released Claims. 8. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court retains 4 jurisdiction over (a) implementation of the Settlement and the terms of the Agreement; (b) 5 distribution of the Settlement to the Class, Class Counsel, the Class Representative, and the 6 Administrator; and (c) all other proceedings related to the implementation, interpretation, 7 administration, consummation, and enforcement of the terms of the Agreement and the 8 Settlement, and the administration of Claims submitted by Settlement Class Members. The time 9 to appeal from this Judgment shall commence upon its entry. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: April 27, 2018 _________________________________ Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 13 United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2FINAL JUDGMENT 4:16-CV-03861-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?