Dye v. Medical Board of California et al
Filing
32
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 31 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2018)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
RICHARD BERRY DYE,
Plaintiff,
5
6
7
8
9
CASE NO. 16-cv-03942-YGR
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
vs.
MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.,
Re: Dkt. No. 31
Defendants.
On September 28, 2016, the Court dismissed with prejudice plaintiff’s case pursuant to
Section 1915 for failure to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 16, (“Dismissal Order”).) Leave to amend was
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
not granted. (See Dkt. No. 25.) Now before the Court is pro se plaintiff Dye’s motion for leave to
12
file an amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 31, (“Motion”).) Allegations of pro se plaintiffs are held to
13
“less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Haines v. Kerner, 92 S.Ct.
14
594, 596 (1972) (citation omitted). “Leave to amend should be granted unless the pleading could
15
not possibly be cured by the allegation of other facts . . . .” McQuillion v. Schwarzenegger, 369
16
F.3d 1091, 1099 (9th Cir. 2004) (citations omitted).
17
As noted by the Court in its September 28, 2016 Order, “[p]laintiff’s claims are plainly
18
barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine as the crux of his complaint is an attack on a state court
19
judgment affirming the Medical Board decision to revoke his license.” (Dismissal Order at 2; see
20
also Dkt. No. 11, (“Report and Recommendation”) at 5.) Additionally, as noted the Court noted,
21
“[t]he statute of limitations provides equally independent grounds to find amendment would be
22
futile.” (Id.; see also Report and Recommendation at 4.) For these reasons, the Court DENIES
23
plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint as futile.
24
This Order terminates Docket Number 31.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: August 14, 2018
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?