Fortanel v. Ducart et al

Filing 42

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION; DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton granting 41 Motion for Extension of Time and denying 41 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Amended Complaint due by 6/4/2018. (Certificate of Service Attached) (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LIBRADO FORTANEL, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 16-cv-03946-PJH v. C. E. DUCART, et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION; DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL Re: Dkt. No. 41 12 13 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that plaintiff’s request for an 14 extension (Docket No. 41) is GRANTED. Plaintiff may have until June 4, 2018, to file an 15 amended complaint. 16 Plaintiff has also filed another motion to appoint counsel. There is no 17 constitutional right to counsel in a civil case, Lassiter v. Dep't of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18 18, 25 (1981), and although district courts may "request" that counsel represent a litigant 19 who is proceeding in forma pauperis, as plaintiff is here, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), that 20 does not give the courts the power to make "coercive appointments of counsel." Mallard 21 v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 310 (1989). 22 The Ninth Circuit has held that a district court may ask counsel to represent an 23 indigent litigant only in "exceptional circumstances," the determination of which requires 24 an evaluation of both (1) the likelihood of success on the merits and (2) the ability of the 25 plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues 26 involved. Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991). 27 28 1 Pla aintiff has presented his claims ad p dequately, and the iss sues are no complex. The ot 2 mo otion is DEN NIED. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDER S RED. Da ated: May 4, 2018 5 6 PH HYLLIS J. H HAMILTON N Un nited States District Ju s udge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 UNITED STATES D D DISTRICT C COURT 2 NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI RN CT IFORNIA 3 4 LI IBRADO FO ORTANEL, Case No. 1 16-cv-03946 6-PJH Plaintiff, 5 v. CERTIFIC CATE OF S SERVICE 6 7 C. E. DUCAR et al., RT, s. Defendants 8 9 10 I, the un ndersigned, hereby certify that I am an employe in the Offi of the Clerk, U.S. ee ice strict Court, Northern Di istrict of Cal lifornia. Dis United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 That on May 4, 201 I SERVE a true and correct cop n 18, ED d py(ies) of the attached, b placing by said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelo addressed to the pers i ope d son(s) herein nafter listed, by dep positing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by pla d n M acing said co opy(ies) into an inter-off delivery o ffice y rec ceptacle loca in the Cl ated lerk's office. . 16 17 18 Lib brado Fortan ID: J-54101 nel De Vocation Institutio euel nal on P.O Box 600, Cell D-227 O. Tra CA 95378-0600 acy, 19 20 21 Da ated: May 4, 2018 22 23 usan Y. Soon ng Su Cl lerk, United States Distr Court d rict 24 25 26 27 By y:_________ ___________ _______ K Kelly Collins, Deputy Cle to the , erk H Honorable PH HYLLIS J. H HAMILTON N 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?