Fortanel v. Ducart et al
Filing
42
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION; DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton granting 41 Motion for Extension of Time and denying 41 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Amended Complaint due by 6/4/2018. (Certificate of Service Attached) (kcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
LIBRADO FORTANEL,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 16-cv-03946-PJH
v.
C. E. DUCART, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION;
DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT
COUNSEL
Re: Dkt. No. 41
12
13
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that plaintiff’s request for an
14
extension (Docket No. 41) is GRANTED. Plaintiff may have until June 4, 2018, to file an
15
amended complaint.
16
Plaintiff has also filed another motion to appoint counsel. There is no
17
constitutional right to counsel in a civil case, Lassiter v. Dep't of Social Services, 452 U.S.
18
18, 25 (1981), and although district courts may "request" that counsel represent a litigant
19
who is proceeding in forma pauperis, as plaintiff is here, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), that
20
does not give the courts the power to make "coercive appointments of counsel." Mallard
21
v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 310 (1989).
22
The Ninth Circuit has held that a district court may ask counsel to represent an
23
indigent litigant only in "exceptional circumstances," the determination of which requires
24
an evaluation of both (1) the likelihood of success on the merits and (2) the ability of the
25
plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues
26
involved. Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991).
27
28
1
Pla
aintiff has presented his claims ad
p
dequately, and the iss
sues are no complex. The
ot
2
mo
otion is DEN
NIED.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: May 4, 2018
5
6
PH
HYLLIS J. H
HAMILTON
N
Un
nited States District Ju
s
udge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT
2
NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA
3
4
LI
IBRADO FO
ORTANEL,
Case No. 1
16-cv-03946
6-PJH
Plaintiff,
5
v.
CERTIFIC
CATE OF S
SERVICE
6
7
C. E. DUCAR et al.,
RT,
s.
Defendants
8
9
10
I, the un
ndersigned, hereby certify that I am an employe in the Offi of the Clerk, U.S.
ee
ice
strict Court, Northern Di
istrict of Cal
lifornia.
Dis
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
That on May 4, 201 I SERVE a true and correct cop
n
18,
ED
d
py(ies) of the attached, b placing
by
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelo addressed to the pers
i
ope
d
son(s) herein
nafter listed, by
dep
positing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by pla
d
n
M
acing said co
opy(ies) into an inter-off delivery
o
ffice
y
rec
ceptacle loca in the Cl
ated
lerk's office.
.
16
17
18
Lib
brado Fortan ID: J-54101
nel
De Vocation Institutio
euel
nal
on
P.O Box 600, Cell D-227
O.
Tra CA 95378-0600
acy,
19
20
21
Da
ated: May 4, 2018
22
23
usan Y. Soon
ng
Su
Cl
lerk, United States Distr Court
d
rict
24
25
26
27
By
y:_________
___________
_______
K
Kelly Collins, Deputy Cle to the
,
erk
H
Honorable PH
HYLLIS J. H
HAMILTON
N
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?