Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v. Kernen Construction Co. et al

Filing 53

ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 50 Joint Discovery Letter Brief Re Dry and Wet Site Inspections filed by Bedrock Investments LLC, Kernen Construction Co., Kurt Kernen, Californians for Alternatives to Toxics, Scott Farley. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/3/2017. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS, Plaintiff, 8 KERNEN CONSTRUCTION CO., ET AL., Defendants. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING AND SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE v. 9 10 Case No. 16-cv-04007-YGR 12 13 On January 31, 2017, the parties filed a joint discovery letter brief asking the Court to 14 resolve certain discovery disputes. The Court held a conference call with the parties on February 15 2, 2017.1 In light of such conference call, the Court SETS a compliance hearing for Friday, 16 February 17, 2017 at 9:01 a.m., in the Federal Building, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California 17 Courtroom 1. No later than February 10, 2017, the parties shall provide the Court with a joint 18 statement updating the Court on the status of the following: 19 1) The parties’ discussions relative to filing of the motions for summary judgment, 20 specifically, whether (i) they will be able to stipulate to certain facts and (ii) formal discovery will 21 be necessary; and 22 2) The parties’ discussions on a plan for site inspections. 23 If compliance is complete, the Court may vacate the compliance hearing and the parties need not 24 appear. 25 26 27 28 1 The parties are advised that the Court is concerned with their level of professional cooperation. The Court understands that there were some issues relating to the basic task of providing the court room deputy with one email listing all available times for both parties for the conference call. Should this lack of cooperation persist, sanctions may be appropriate. 1 The Court further SETS the following briefing schedule for cross-motions for summary 2 judgment with regards to plaintiffs’ claims under Proposition 65: Defendants must file their 3 motion for summary judgment by March 28, 2017. Plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary 4 judgment and opposition to defendants’ motion must be filed by April 11, 2017. Defendants’ 5 opposition to plaintiff’s motion and reply in support of its own motion are due on April 25, 2017, 6 and plaintiff’s reply in support of its own motion is due on May 2, 2017. The hearing on such 7 cross-motions for summary judgment shall be held on May 16, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. The parties 8 need not file pre-summary judgment letters as would normally be required under the Court’s 9 Standing Order in Civil Cases. This Order terminates Docket Number 50. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 Dated: February 3, 2017 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?