Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v. Kernen Construction Co. et al
Filing
92
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS re 91 . Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/3/2017. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2017)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO
TOXICS,
Plaintiff,
8
vs.
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS
Re: Dkt. No. 91
9
10
CASE NO. 16-cv-04007-YGR
KERNEN CONSTRUCTION CO., ET AL.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
On May 2, 2017, in connection with plaintiff’s reply in support of its motion for partial
13
summary judgment, plaintiff filed separately “Objections to Evidence Submitted in Support of
14
Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.” (Dkt. No. 91.)
15
Such filing is in contravention of the Local Rules, which provide thus: “Any reply to an
16
opposition may include affidavits or declarations, as well as a supplemental brief or memorandum
17
under Civil L.R. 7-4. Any evidentiary and procedural objections to the opposition must be
18
contained within the reply brief or memorandum.” Civil L.R. 7-3(c).
19
Accordingly, plaintiff’s filing at Docket Number 91 is hereby STRICKEN from the record.
20
The parties are reminded of their obligations to comply with the Local Rules of this District and
21
this Court’s Standing Orders. Further failures to comply may result in sanctions.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: May 3, 2017
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?