Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v. Kernen Construction Co. et al

Filing 92

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS re 91 . Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/3/2017. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS, Plaintiff, 8 vs. ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS Re: Dkt. No. 91 9 10 CASE NO. 16-cv-04007-YGR KERNEN CONSTRUCTION CO., ET AL., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 On May 2, 2017, in connection with plaintiff’s reply in support of its motion for partial 13 summary judgment, plaintiff filed separately “Objections to Evidence Submitted in Support of 14 Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.” (Dkt. No. 91.) 15 Such filing is in contravention of the Local Rules, which provide thus: “Any reply to an 16 opposition may include affidavits or declarations, as well as a supplemental brief or memorandum 17 under Civil L.R. 7-4. Any evidentiary and procedural objections to the opposition must be 18 contained within the reply brief or memorandum.” Civil L.R. 7-3(c). 19 Accordingly, plaintiff’s filing at Docket Number 91 is hereby STRICKEN from the record. 20 The parties are reminded of their obligations to comply with the Local Rules of this District and 21 this Court’s Standing Orders. Further failures to comply may result in sanctions. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 3, 2017 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?