Hintsa v. Rockport Health Services

Filing 22

ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 3/24/2017. Compliance hearing currently set for February 24, 2017 is CONTINUED to Friday, March 31, 2017 at 9:01 am before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/22/2017. (cpS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KESETE B HINTSA, Case No. 16-cv-04045-YGR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE HEARING; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 10 ROCKPORT HEALTH SERVICES, Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 In light of defendants’ submission at Docket Number 21, the Court CONTINUES the 13 compliance hearing currently set for February 24, 2017 to Friday, March 31, 2017 at 9:01 a.m. in 14 the Federal Building, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, Courtroom 1. No later than March 15 24, 2017, the parties must file a statement indicating that arbitration proceedings have been 16 initiated and updating the Court on the status of such arbitration. If compliance is complete, the 17 Court may vacate the hearing and the parties need not appear. 18 If arbitration proceedings have not yet been initiated as of that date, the plaintiff is hereby 19 ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. In 20 such case, plaintiff must file by March 24, 2017 a statement explaining the failure timely to 21 initiate arbitration proceedings. Failure to submit such statement will be deemed an admission 22 that there is no good cause for plaintiff’s delay and that dismissal of the instant action for failure to 23 prosecute is appropriate. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 22, 2017 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?