Maalik v. Evergreen Shipping Agency (America) Corporation

Filing 52

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 51 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO ALLOW TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE re 50 Case Management Statement filed by Muhammad Maalik. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 6/15/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 BIRNBERG & ASSOCIATES CORY A. BIRNBERG (SBN 105468) 1083 Mission Street, Third Floor San Francisco, California 94103 Telephone Number: (415) 398-1040 Facsimile Number: (415) 398-2001 Attorneys for Plaintiff MUHAMMAD MAALIK 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. 4:16-cv-04111-KAW MUHAMMAD MAALIK, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) EVERGREEN SHIPPING AGENCY ) (AMERICA) CORPORATION; ) EVERGREEN MARINE GROUP; DOES 1 ) THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, ) ) ) Defendants. ___________________________________ ) [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: APPLICATION FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE BY DEFENSE COUNSEL AND/OR FOR CONTINUATION OF FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 18 19 20 The parties' joint application for defense counsel to appear telephonically at the Further Case Management Conference on June 19, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. is GRANTED. 21 22 23 Counsel shall comply with the Court’s Standing Order on Procedures for Telephonic Appearances, available online at http://cand.uscourts.gov/kaworders. This includes 24 personally arranging the telephonic appearance with CourtCall—a paid, private service—in 25 advance of the hearing date. 26 [OR ALTERNATIVELY] 27 28 ORDER GRANTING TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE -1- Case No. 4:16-cv-04111-KAW 1 2 The Further Case Management Conference scheduled for June 19, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. is continued until __________________, 2018 at _______. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6/15/18 ______________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE -2- Case No. 4:16-cv-04111-KAW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?