Maalik v. Evergreen Shipping Agency (America) Corporation
Filing
52
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 51 . STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO ALLOW TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE re 50 Case Management Statement filed by Muhammad Maalik. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 6/15/18. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
BIRNBERG & ASSOCIATES
CORY A. BIRNBERG (SBN 105468)
1083 Mission Street, Third Floor
San Francisco, California 94103
Telephone Number: (415) 398-1040
Facsimile Number: (415) 398-2001
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MUHAMMAD MAALIK
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 4:16-cv-04111-KAW
MUHAMMAD MAALIK,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
EVERGREEN SHIPPING AGENCY
)
(AMERICA) CORPORATION;
)
EVERGREEN MARINE GROUP; DOES 1 )
THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE,
)
)
)
Defendants.
___________________________________ )
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE:
APPLICATION FOR TELEPHONIC
APPEARANCE BY DEFENSE
COUNSEL AND/OR FOR
CONTINUATION OF FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
18
19
20
The parties' joint application for defense counsel to appear telephonically at the
Further Case Management Conference on June 19, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. is GRANTED.
21
22
23
Counsel shall comply with the Court’s Standing Order on Procedures for Telephonic
Appearances, available online at http://cand.uscourts.gov/kaworders. This includes
24
personally arranging the telephonic appearance with CourtCall—a paid, private service—in
25
advance of the hearing date.
26
[OR ALTERNATIVELY]
27
28
ORDER GRANTING TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE
-1-
Case No. 4:16-cv-04111-KAW
1
2
The Further Case Management Conference scheduled for June 19, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.
is continued until __________________, 2018 at _______.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 6/15/18
______________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE
-2-
Case No. 4:16-cv-04111-KAW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?