Joseph Joshua Davis et al v. Comcast Corporation, et al
Filing
34
ORDER RELATING TRANSFERRED CASES; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES IN RELATED CASES; DEFERRING RULING ON WHETHER STAYED CASES ARE RELATED; AND REQUIRING STATUS REPORT RE STAYED CASESJoint Case Management Statement due by 9/16/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/23/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/4/16. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MATTHEW JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
v.
COMCAST OF
CALIFORNIA/COLORADO/
WASHINGTON I, INC,
Defendant.
12
13
Case No. 10-cv-04147-JSW
DUSTIN POOLE,
Case No. 13-cv-03772-JSW
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
DANIEL CANADAY, et al.,
Case No. 15-cv-04648-JSW
Plaintiffs,
19
v.
20
21
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
22
23
EDMUNDO ORTEGA, JR., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
24
v.
25
26
27
28
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 15-cv-04676-JSW
1
Plaintiffs,
2
3
4
v.
5
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
6
LAMBERTO VALENCIA, et al.,
8
9
10
11
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
16
Plaintiffs,
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
RICHARD NELSON, et al.,
19
20
21
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
CALEB DUBOIS, et al.,
24
25
Case No. 15-cv-04809-JSW
Plaintiffs,
22
23
Case No. 15-cv-04793-JSW
Plaintiffs,
17
18
Case No. 15-cv-04782-JSW
JEFFREY COLEMAN, et al.,
12
13
Case No. 15-cv-04771-JSW
Plaintiffs,
7
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 15-cv-04732-JSW
JASON WILLIAMS, et al.,
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
26
27
28
2
1
GREGORY PETERS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
2
3
4
5
6
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
LUPE LANDIN, JR., et al.,
9
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
CORY BARRETT HALL,
14
v.
COMCAST OF CONTRA COSTA, INC., et
al.,
15
16
Defendants.
FRANCISCO FLORES, et al.,
17
18
19
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
JOSEPH JOSHUA DAVIS, et al.,
22
23
24
25
Case No. 16-cv-04176-JSW
Plaintiffs,
20
21
Case No. 16-cv-04175-JSW
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. 16-cv-04174-JSW
Plaintiffs,
7
8
Case No. 15-cv-04869-JSW
Case No. 16-cv-04177-JSW
Plaintiffs,
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
26
27
28
3
1
JAMES K. GRIMES, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
2
3
4
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
5
6
STEPHEN MCBRIDE, et al.,
9
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
LAWRENCE ELKINS, et al.,
14
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
HERNAN PAEZ, et al.,
19
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
20
21
KRIS COOK, et al.,
24
25
Case No. 16-cv-04182-JSW
Plaintiffs,
22
23
Case No. 16-cv-04181-JSW
Plaintiffs,
17
18
Case No. 16-cv-04180-JSW
Plaintiffs,
12
13
Case No. 16-cv-04179-JSW
Plaintiffs,
7
8
Case No. 16-cv-04178-JSW
v.
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
26
27
28
4
1
KEVIN HUFFMAN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
2
ORDER RELATING
TRANSFERREDCASES;CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCES IN RELATED CASES;
DEFERRING RULING ON WHETHER
STAYED CASES ARE RELATED; AND
REQUIRING STATUS REPORT RE
STAYED CASES
v.
3
4
Case No. 16-cv-04183-JSW
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
5
6
7
8
1.
The Transferred Cases Are Related.
On July 21, 2016, the Eastern District of California transferred ten cases to this Court. See
10
Landin v. Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04174-JSW; Hall v. Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04175-JSW; Flores v.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
9
Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04176-JSW; Davis v. Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04177-JSW; Grimes v.
12
Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04178-JSW; McBride v. Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04179-JSW; Elkins v.
13
Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04180-JSW; Paez v. Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04181-JSW; Cook v. Comcast
14
Corp., 16-cv-04182-JSW; Huffman v. Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04183-JSW (collectively, the
15
“transferred cases”). By order of the Executive Committee of this Court, all ten cases were
16
assigned to the undersigned.
17
On January 15, 2016, the Eastern District of California had ordered that these ten
18
transferred cases were related to each other within the meaning of Eastern District of California
19
Local Rule 123(a). Following transfer of the ten cases to this Court, Plaintiffs filed a motion to
20
relate the ten cases to eight related cases already pending before the undersigned: Canaday v.
21
Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04648-JSW; Ortega v. Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04676-JSW; Williams v.
22
Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04732-JSW; Valencia v. Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04771-JSW; Coleman v.
23
Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04782-JSW; Nelson v. Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04793-JSW; DuBois v.
24
Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04809-JSW; and Peters v. Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04869-JSW. Defendants
25
responded that they do not believe that the cases meet the definition set forth in Civil Local Rule
26
3-12(a), but that they have no objection to coordination of the cases for purposes of discovery or
27
deciding common legal issues.
28
Upon review of the record, the Court finds that each of the ten transferred cases IS
5
1
RELATED to Canaday v. Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04648-JSW, and all other cases related to
2
Canaday, as defined by Civil Local Rule 3-12. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the motion to
3
relate the cases. Because the cases are already assigned to the undersigned, further reassignment
4
is not necessary.
5
2.
The Court Continues the Case Management Conferences in the Related Cases.
6
Case management conferences in all eighteen related cases are currently scheduled for
7
September 9, 2016, at 11:00 a.m. On August 1 and 2, 2016, the parties filed a stipulation and
8
proposed order in the ten transferred cases only, requesting that the case management conferences
9
in the ten transferred cases be moved to September 23, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. The Court GRANTS
this request. The initial case management conferences in the following cases are HEREBY
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
RESCHEDULED to September 23, 2016 at 11:00 a.m.: Landin v. Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04174-
12
JSW; Hall v. Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04175-JSW; Flores v. Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04176-JSW;
13
Davis v. Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04177-JSW; Grimes v. Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04178-JSW;
14
McBride v. Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04179-JSW; Elkins v. Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04180-JSW; Paez
15
v. Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04181-JSW; Cook v. Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04182-JSW; Huffman v.
16
Comcast Corp., 16-cv-04183-JSW.
17
Additionally, the Court sua sponte RESCHEDULES the further case management
18
conferences in the other eight related cases to September 23, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. See Canaday v.
19
Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04648-JSW; Ortega v. Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04676-JSW; Williams v.
20
Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04732-JSW; Valencia v. Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04771-JSW; Coleman v.
21
Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04782-JSW; Nelson v. Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04793-JSW; DuBois v.
22
Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04809-JSW; and Peters v. Comcast Corp., 15-cv-04869-JSW.
23
The joint case management statement in each of the related cases is due September 16,
24
2016. The parties are encouraged to file a single joint case management statement in all of the
25
related cases, which may have separate subsections for case-specific topics. The parties may also
26
file case-specific joint statements as necessary. If the parties file the same case management
27
statement in multiple cases, the parties should file only a single chambers copy, not a duplicate
28
chambers copy for each case.
6
1
3.
The Co
ourt Defers Ruling on Whether the Stayed Ca Are Rel
W
e
ases
lated.
On July 13, 2016, the Court ord
y
dered the par
rties to meet and confer to consider whether two
t
o
2
3
ditional case Johnson v. Comcast of California
es,
v
o
a/Colorado/W
Washington I., Inc., No. 10-cvadd
4
041
147-JSW, an Poole v. Comcast Cor
nd
C
rporation, N 13-cv-03
No.
3772-JSW, are related to Canaday
5
and all other ca related to Canaday. Johnson an Poole are stayed pend
d
ases
t
nd
e
ding final resolution of
6
Fay
yerweather v. Comcast Corporation and Comca of Contra Costa, Inc., Superior C
v
C
n
ast
a
Court of
7
California in an for Contr Costa Cou
nd
ra
unty No. C-0
08-01470. T parties in Johnson an Poole
The
n
nd
8
ve
ered to subm status repo to this c
mit
orts
court every 1 days.
120
hav been orde
In respo
onse to the Court’s order the parties request that the stay of Johnson and Poole
C
r,
s
at
f
d
9
rem in place for sixty da to permit the parties to discuss v
main
e
ays,
s
voluntary resolution of t
these two
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
cas
ses. The par
rties request that the Cou defer add
urt
dressing the q
question of w
whether John
nson and
12
Poole should be related to Canaday an all other c
b
nd
cases related to Canaday while the st remains
y
tay
13
in place. The Court GRAN this request.
p
C
NTS
14
4.
The Pa
arties Shall File a Furth Status R
F
her
Report in th Stayed Ca
he
ases.
15
The par
rties in Johnson and Poo SHALL f a further joint status report no la than
ole
file
r
ater
16
Oc
ctober 3, 2016. In additio to any oth issues th the partie may addre in the join status
on
her
hat
es
ess
nt
17
rep
port, the part shall add
ties
dress: (1) wh
hether Johnso and Pool should be related to C
on
le
Canaday and
18
all other cases related to Ca
anaday; and (2) whether Johnson an Poole sho
d
r
nd
ould remain stayed.
19
20
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: August 4, 2016
21
22
JE
EFFREY S. W
WHITE
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?