Grimes et al v. Comcast Corporation et al
Filing
59
Order by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas granting in part and denying in part 56 Discovery Letter Brief.(njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
EUREKA DIVISION
7
8
JAMES K. GRIMES, et al.,
Case No. 16-cv-04178-JSW (NJV)
Plaintiffs,
9
ORDER RE DISCOVERY LETTER
BRIEF
v.
10
11
COMCAST CORPORATION, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 56
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
14
15
The parties filed a Joint Discovery Letter Brief in this action on March 30, 2017. (Doc.
16
17
56.) The matter was heard before the court on April 4, 2017. (Doc. 58.) The court heard the
18
arguments of the parties and rules as follows as to the disputes raised.
19
1.
20
times for the depositions of the remaining Plaintiffs.
21
2.
22
who are still currently employed by Comcast.
23
3.
24
for supervisors who are no longer employed by Comcast.
25
4.
26
contacted.
27
5.
28
Subject to contrary provisions in Judge White's standing orders, depositions involving persons
No later than April 25, 2017, Plaintiffs are to provide Defendants with a list of dates and
No later than April 14, 2017, Defendants are to provide Plaintiffs with a list of supervisors
No later than April 21, 2017, Defendants are to provide Plaintiffs with contact information
Supervisors are to be subpoenaed by Plaintiffs for their depositions, rather than simply
Defendants' Rule 30(b)(b) deponent will sit for her deposition no later than April 28, 2017.
1
living outside of California will be conducted via video
2
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 11, 2017
______________________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?