Williams v. Lujan
Filing
32
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 31 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIMERe 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 8/28/2017; Replies due by 9/11/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
ANTHONY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff,
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 16-cv-04290-HSG (PR)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
v.
Re: Dkt. No. 31
A. LUJAN,
Defendant.
12
13
14
Good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file an opposition to
15
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his opposition no
16
later than August 28, 2017. Defendant shall file his reply no later than fourteen (14) days after
17
the date of service of the opposition.
18
Plaintiff requests an order from the Court permitting him to: (1) make phone calls
19
necessary to securing declarations from correctional officers, and (2) maintain in his possession
20
pictures of standard issue boots so that he can submit them as evidence in support of his
21
opposition. Plaintiff’s request is DENIED. Plaintiff has not shown that propounding discovery
22
would be insufficient for his purposes. Moreover, the restrictions Plaintiff complains of are
23
presumably due to rules or regulations set forth by San Quentin State Prison, which is not a party
24
to this action.
25
If Plaintiff determines that necessary facts are unavailable to him due to lack of discovery,
26
Plaintiff may, along with his opposition, file a declaration pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
27
Procedure 56(d). Rule 56(d) provides that if a party opposing a summary judgment motion shows
28
“by affidavit or declaration that, for specified reasons, it cannot present facts essential to justify its
1
opposition, the court may (1) defer considering the motion or deny it; (2) allow time to obtain
2
affidavits or declarations or to take discovery; or (3) issue any other appropriate order. Fed. R.
3
Civ. P. 56(d).
4
This order terminates Docket No. 31.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: 7/19/2017
7
8
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?