Gray v. Apple, Incorporated et al

Filing 84

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 3/14/2017. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 3/7/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

TERELL GRAY,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

Case No.16-cv-04421-HSG
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v.

Re: Dkt. No. 82
APPLE INCORPORATED, et al.,
Defendants.
On December 14, 2016, Plaintiff submitted a letter brief, signed by Plaintiff rather than his

13

attorneys, in opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 75. On February 21, 2017,

14

the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff’s counsel to show cause why this purported pro se

15

opposition was filed and what the status of Plaintiff’s representation was in the current action.

16

Dkt. No. 82. Plaintiff’s counsel failed to respond.

17

The Court ORDERS Plaintiff’s counsel to show cause why they should not be sanctioned

18

for failing to respond. Counsel must file a statement of two pages or less by March 14, 2017,

19

responding to this order to show cause.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21

Dated: 3/7/2017

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge