Richard Farley v. Ronald Davis

Filing 23

ORDER Denying Pro Se Motion. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/10/2017. (pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES D
DISTRICT C
COURT

5

NORTHER DISTRIC OF CAL
N
RN
CT
LIFORNIA

6
7

RICHARD WADE FARL
R
W
LEY,

Case No. 16-cv-444
43-PJH

Petitioner,

DEATH PENALTY C
CASE

8
v.

ORDER D
DENYING P
PRO SE MO
OTION

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

RON DAVIS, Warden, San Quenti
R
S
in
State Prison,
Responde
ent.

12
INTRODU
UCTION

13
14

The Co is in receipt of Far
ourt
rley’s pro s e letter filed April 27, 2
d
2017, wher
rein he

15

see an Order granting access to an electron version of his trial t
eks
nic
transcripts a a
and

16

computer sys
stem in his cell on whic to view the transcrip
c
ch
pts. See ECF Doc. 21
1.

17

Farley is represen
nted by cou
unsel and re
epresented parties do not have th right to
d
he

18

oceed pro se. See Un
s
nited States v. Olano, 6 F.3d 118 1193 (9 Cir. 199
s
62
9th
95). The
pro
80,

19

“rig to couns and the right to pro
ght
sel
e
oceed pro s are disju
se
unctive right
ts.” United States v.
d

20

Cro
rowhurst, 62 F.2d 129 1301 (9 Cir. 1980 Here, F
29
97,
9th
0).
Farley has t
two attorneys acting

21

on his behalf who are ab to file an motion th in their profession judgmen they
ble
ny
hat,
r
nal
nt,

22

deem to have merit. Thu any motion Farley wishes to p
e
us,
present to t Court m
the
must be

23

file through his counsel of record. According this mot
ed
h
l
gly,
tion is DEN
NIED.

24

IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.

25
26
27
28

Da
ated: May 10, 2017
1
__
__________
__________
__________
_________
PH
HYLLIS J. H
HAMILTON
Un
nited States District Ju
s
udge