Ortiz v. Genco I, Inc. et al
Filing
25
CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 11/23/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2016)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
ADAN ORTIZ,
4
Case No. 16-cv-04601-YGR
Plaintiff,
5
v.
CASE MANAGEMENT AND
PRETRIAL ORDER
6
GENCO I, INC., et al.,
7
Defendants.
8
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
9
The Court hereby sets the following trial and pretrial dates:
10
PRETRIAL SCHEDULE
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:
December 1, 2017
13
PLAINTIFF CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION FILED
MAY 30, 2016; OPPOSITION JUNE 27, 2018; REPLY
FILED JULY 18, 2017. HEARING ON MOTION:
August 8, 2017 at 2:00pm
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS (RETAINED/NONRETAINED):
Plaintiff: January 5, 2018
Defendant: January 26, 2018
14
15
16
Rebuttal Reports: February 9, 2018
17
18
EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:
March 9, 2018
19
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS1 / DAUBERT MOTIONS To BE
HEARD BY: 35 day notice.
Filed by March 27, 2018
COMPLIANCE HEARING (SEE PAGE 2)
Friday, June 1, 2018 at 9:01 a.m.
22
JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT:
June 8, 2018
23
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE:
Friday, June 22, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.
24
TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH:
Monday, July 9, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. for 5
days
(Jury Trial)
20
21
25
26
27
1
28
See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for summary
judgment.
1
Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases at Section 2, trial counsel shall meet
2
and confer at least twenty-one (21) days in advance of the Pretrial Conference. The compliance
3
hearing on Friday, June 5, 2018 at 9:01 a.m. is intended to confirm that counsel have reviewed the
4
Court’s Pretrial Setting Instructions and are in compliance therewith. The compliance hearing
5
shall be held in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, in Courtroom 1.
6
Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file a one-page
7
JOINT STATEMENT confirming they have complied with this requirement or explaining their
8
failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance
9
hearing will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions.
The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing
12
Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All
13
Standing Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders.
14
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 23, 2016
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Court Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?