Ortiz v. Genco I, Inc. et al

Filing 25

CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 11/23/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2016)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 ADAN ORTIZ, 4 Case No. 16-cv-04601-YGR Plaintiff, 5 v. CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER 6 GENCO I, INC., et al., 7 Defendants. 8 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: 9 The Court hereby sets the following trial and pretrial dates: 10 PRETRIAL SCHEDULE United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: December 1, 2017 13 PLAINTIFF CLASS CERTIFICATION MOTION FILED MAY 30, 2016; OPPOSITION JUNE 27, 2018; REPLY FILED JULY 18, 2017. HEARING ON MOTION: August 8, 2017 at 2:00pm DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS (RETAINED/NONRETAINED): Plaintiff: January 5, 2018 Defendant: January 26, 2018 14 15 16 Rebuttal Reports: February 9, 2018 17 18 EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF: March 9, 2018 19 DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS1 / DAUBERT MOTIONS To BE HEARD BY: 35 day notice. Filed by March 27, 2018 COMPLIANCE HEARING (SEE PAGE 2) Friday, June 1, 2018 at 9:01 a.m. 22 JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT: June 8, 2018 23 PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Friday, June 22, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. 24 TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH: Monday, July 9, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. for 5 days (Jury Trial) 20 21 25 26 27 1 28 See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for summary judgment. 1 Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases at Section 2, trial counsel shall meet 2 and confer at least twenty-one (21) days in advance of the Pretrial Conference. The compliance 3 hearing on Friday, June 5, 2018 at 9:01 a.m. is intended to confirm that counsel have reviewed the 4 Court’s Pretrial Setting Instructions and are in compliance therewith. The compliance hearing 5 shall be held in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, in Courtroom 1. 6 Five (5) business days prior to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file a one-page 7 JOINT STATEMENT confirming they have complied with this requirement or explaining their 8 failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance 9 hearing will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions. The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing 12 Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All 13 Standing Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders. 14 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 23, 2016 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS United States District Court Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?