Katherine Milton et al v. Atain Specialty Insurance Company

Filing 28

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE: Parties have agreed to bear their own costs and attorneys fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 3/13/17. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2017)

1

HOWIE & SMITH, L.L.P.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1777 BOREL PLACE, SUITE 1000
SAN M ATEO, CA 94402-3509
T EL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

2
3
4

7

ROBERT G. HOWIE, SBN 057361
AUDREY SMITH, SBN 180836
A T T ORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS KATHERINE MILTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE FOR THE KATHERINE VA SSER
CROMMELIN MILTON LIVING TRUST; JOHN G. CROMMELIN IV, INDIVIDUALLY; RANDALL TURNER INDIVIDUALLY
AND AS TRUSTEE FOR THE LILLIAN B. CROMMELIN, JAMES HAMPTON GOING & JAMES MERRITT REED JR.
DESCENDANTS’ TRUSTS

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

OAKLAND DIVISION

5
6

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

KATHERINE MILTON, individually and
as TRUSTEE FOR THE KATHERINE
VASSER CROMMELIN MILTON
LIVING TRUST; JOHN G. CROMMELIN
IV, individually; RANDALL TURNER,
individually and as TRUSTEE FOR THE
LILLIAN B. CROMMELIN, JAMES
HAMPTON GOING & JAMES MERRITT
REED JR., DESCENDANTS’ TRUSTS

23

PLAINTIFFS REQUEST AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

)

Case Filed: July 13, 2016

Plaintiffs have agreed to settlement, and performance of the terms of the settlement has been
accomplished, the parties have agreed to bear their own costs and attorneys fees, there are no crossactions in the matter.

24
25

Case No. 4:16-CV-04604-DMR

)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
ATAIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE
)
COMPANY, a Michigan corporation,
)
and DOES 1-25, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)

21
22

)
)
)
)
)
)
)

The plaintiffs therefore request entry of a dismissal order with prejudice.
//

26
27
28

1
PLAINTIFFS REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

1

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is

2

true and correct.

3

Executed in San Mateo California, County of San Mateo on March 10, 2017.
HOWIE & SMITH, L.L.P.

4

/s/Robert G. Howie
Robert G. Howie, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff
KATHERINE MILTON, individually and as
TRUSTEE FOR THE KATHERINE VASSER
CROMMELIN MILTON LIVING TRUST;
JOHN G. CROMMELIN IV, individually,
RANDALL TURNER, individually and as
TRUS TEE F O R THE LI LLIAN B.
CROMMELIN JAMES HAMPTON GOING &
JAMES MERRITT REED JR. DESCENDANTS’
TRUSTS

By:

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

15
16

actions in the matter.
On request of the plaintiffs for entry of a dismissal with prejudice, and for good cause shown:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action be and is dismissed with prejudice.

19

ERED
__________________________________________
O ORD
IT IS S
THE HONORABLE DONNA M. RYU,
MAGISTRATE M. Ryu
JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES
a
Judge COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
DISTRICT Donn
OF CALIFORNIA C
ER
NO

RT

20

Dated: March 13 2017
__,

UNIT
ED

18

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

S

17

R NIA

14

accomplished, the parties have agreed to bear their own costs and attorneys fees, there are no cross-

FO

13

Plaintiffs have agreed to settlement, and performance of the terms of the settlement have been

A

H

LI

12

[Proposed] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

N

21

F
D IS T IC T O
R

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
PLAINTIFFS REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

1
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of this document was served electronically on March 10, 2017 on counsel
of record in compliance with Federal Rule 5, Local Rule 5-6, by use of the Court’s ECF system.

3
/s/ Robert G. Howie
Robert G. Howie, Esq.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
PLAINTIFFS REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE