Nicholas Alford v. J.P. Morgan Chase, N.A.

Filing 80

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 79 Stipulated Dismissal With Prejudice. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Joseph E. Addiego III (CA SBN 169522)
John D. Freed (CA SBN 261518)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

OAKLAND DIVISION

11
12

NICHOLAS ALFORD,

13

Plaintiff,

14
15
16

v.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. 16-cv-04723-HSG

) Case No. 16-cv-04723-HSG
)
) STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH
) PREJUDICE; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1
2
3
4
5

Subject to the Court’s approval, the parties HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE as
follows:
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), this action and all claims in this action are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without fees or costs to either side.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

6
7

DATED: April 17, 2018

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

8
By: /s/ John D. Freed

9

Joseph E. Addiego III
John D. Freed

10
11

Attorneys for Defendant
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

12
13

TRN LAW ASSOCIATES

14
15

By: /s/ Tiffany R. Norman
Tiffany R. Norman (SBN 239873)
TRN LAW ASSOCIATES
870 Market Street, Suite 786
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone: [phone]

16
17
18
19

Attorney for Plaintiff
NICHOLAS ALFORD

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

28

Case No. 16-cv-04723-HSG

1
2
3

CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE
Pursuant to L.R. 5-1, I hereby attest that Tiffany Norman, counsel for Plaintiff Nicholas
Alford, has provided her concurrence in the electronic filing of the foregoing document entitled

4
STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE.
5
/s/ John D. Freed

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. 16-cv-04723-HSG

ORDE
ER

1
2

Presently before the Court is the parties’ Stip
y
e
pulated Dism
missal with P
Prejudice

3

(“St
tipulation”). Good cause appearing therefore, th Court GRA
e
t
he
ANTS the p
parties’ Stipu
ulation, as

4

follo
ows:

5
6

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)
t
C
)(2), this acti and all c
ion
claims in this action are h
s
hereby
dism
missed with prejudice an without fe or costs t either side
p
nd
ees
to
e.

7
8
9

SO ORD
DERED.
DATED April 17, 2018
D:
2

___________
__________
____
_________
Hon. Hayw
wood S. Gilli
iam, Jr.
UNITED S
STATES DIS
STRICT JUD
DGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIP
PULATED DIS
SMISSAL WIT PREJUDIC
TH
CE
Case No. 16-cv-0472
23-HSG