Rattan v. Colvin
Filing
25
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/30/17. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
BRIAN STRETCH, SBN CA 163793
United States Attorney
SARA WINSLOW, DCBN 457643
Chief of the Civil Division
DEBORAH STACHEL, SBN CA 230138
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
JENNIFER KENNEY, SBN CA 241625
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8945
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: jennifer.a.kenney@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Attorneys for Defendant
KAREN RATTAN, Defendant
Attorneys for
Plaintiff,
vs.
16
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of
Social Security,
17
Defendant.
15
)
) CIVIL NO. 4:16-CV-04779-YGR
)
) [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
In accordance with the Court’s August 7, 2017, order denying plaintiff Rattan’s motion for
20
summary judgment and granting defendant Berryhill’s cross-motion for summary judgment, judgment is
21
entered in favor of defendant Berryhill and against plaintiff Rattan with respect to all claims asserted in
22
23
24
the complaint. The clerk is ordered to terminate case No. 16-cv-04779-YGR.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated: August 30, 2017
HON. YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
[Proposed] Judgment, 4:16-CV-04779-YGR
1
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
3
Date: August 15, 2017
By:
4
5
6
Date: August 15, 2017
BRIAN STRETCH
United States Attorney
7
8
/s/ * Harvey Peter Sackett
HARVEY PETER SACKETT
(*authorized by email on Aug. 15, 2017)
Attorney for Plaintiff
By:
9
/s/ Jennifer A. Kenney
JENNIFER A. KENNEY
Special Assistant United States Attorney
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Judgment, 4:16-CV-04779-YGR
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?