Rattan v. Colvin

Filing 25

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/30/17. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 BRIAN STRETCH, SBN CA 163793 United States Attorney SARA WINSLOW, DCBN 457643 Chief of the Civil Division DEBORAH STACHEL, SBN CA 230138 Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration JENNIFER KENNEY, SBN CA 241625 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8945 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: jennifer.a.kenney@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Attorneys for Defendant KAREN RATTAN, Defendant Attorneys for Plaintiff, vs. 16 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 17 Defendant. 15 ) ) CIVIL NO. 4:16-CV-04779-YGR ) ) [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 19 In accordance with the Court’s August 7, 2017, order denying plaintiff Rattan’s motion for 20 summary judgment and granting defendant Berryhill’s cross-motion for summary judgment, judgment is 21 entered in favor of defendant Berryhill and against plaintiff Rattan with respect to all claims asserted in 22 23 24 the complaint. The clerk is ordered to terminate case No. 16-cv-04779-YGR. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: August 30, 2017 HON. YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 [Proposed] Judgment, 4:16-CV-04779-YGR 1 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 3 Date: August 15, 2017 By: 4 5 6 Date: August 15, 2017 BRIAN STRETCH United States Attorney 7 8 /s/ * Harvey Peter Sackett HARVEY PETER SACKETT (*authorized by email on Aug. 15, 2017) Attorney for Plaintiff By: 9 /s/ Jennifer A. Kenney JENNIFER A. KENNEY Special Assistant United States Attorney 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Judgment, 4:16-CV-04779-YGR 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?