Juan v. Regents of the University of California et al

Filing 71

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/3/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2018)

1
2
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
ex rel. DIANA JUAN,

Case No. 16-cv-04934-CW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS
AGAINST UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO

8
v.
United States District Court
Northern District of California

9
10
11
12
13

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA; UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO;
STEPHEN HAUSER; JOHN ENGSTROM;
SAM HAWGOOD; EILEEN KAHANER;
DAVID MORGAN; JANE CZECH;
SCOTT DE,
Defendants.

14
15
16

The Court has reviewed the parties’ supplemental briefing

17

regarding whether the claims of Plaintiff-Relator Diana Juan

18

against Defendant University of California San Francisco (UCSF)

19

should be dismissed.

20

briefing and argument at the hearing, the Court hereby dismisses

21

all claims against UCSF with prejudice.

22
23

After considering the record, the parties’

BACKGROUND
Plaintiff-Relator alleges that UCSF, the Regents of the

24

University of California (Regents) and the Individual Defendants

25

violated the False Claims Act (FCA) in submitting Medicare claims

26

for services at UCSF Medical Center.

27

August 26, 2016 and filed the First Amended Complaint (1AC) on

28

September 20, 2016.

She filed this action on

Both complaints were initially filed under

1

seal.

2

intervene in this action, the Court unsealed the complaint and

3

1AC and ordered Plaintiff-Relator to serve Defendants.

4

subsequently filed a voluntary dismissal without prejudice, to

5

which the United States consented, of the Regents.

6

Relator’s request, the Court issued a summons to the Individual

7

Defendants, who waived service and moved to dismiss.

8
United States District Court
Northern District of California

9

On June 26, 2017, the United States having declined to

She

At Plaintiff-

On October 5, 2017, the Court issued an order to show cause
regarding Plaintiff-Relator’s failure to serve UCSF within the

10

ninety days provided under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

11

Plaintiff-Relator requested additional time for service.

12

October 12, 2017, the Court granted an extension to October 23,

13

2017 to serve UCSF.

14

deadline, but on October 30, 2017, requested that the Court issue

15

a summons to UCSF.

16

should issue or whether all claims against UCSF should be

17

dismissed, either based on the failure to serve timely or because

18

UCSF does not exist, as a separate entity from the Regents, with

19

capacity to be sued.

On

Plaintiff-Relator failed to meet this

The Court heard argument on whether a summons

20

DISCUSSION

21

Defendants contend that all claims against UCSF should be

22

dismissed because it does not exist, or have the capacity to be

23

sued, as a separate legal entity from the Regents.

24

“University of California campuses and medical centers are

25

subsumed entities of The Regents and not independent legal

26

entities.”

27

on the Regents); see also Cal. Const. Art. IX, § 9(f) (Regents

28

“shall be vested with the legal title and the management and

All

Luskey Dec. ¶ 5, Ex. B (Policy on Service of Process

2

1

disposition of the property of the university and of property

2

held for its benefit” and shall “have all the powers necessary or

3

convenient for the effective administration of its trust,

4

including the power to sue and to be sued”); Cal. Civ. Proc. Code

5

§ 416.50 (providing for service of summons on public entities,

6

including Regents).

7

At the hearing, the Court granted Plaintiff-Relator the
opportunity to file a supplemental brief on this issue.

9
United States District Court
Northern District of California

8

Plaintiff-Relator provided no persuasive authority, but argued

10

that the authority provided by Defendants is not controlling.

11

She focused largely on the separate question of whether UCSF or

12

the Regents would be immune from suit under the Eleventh

13

Amendment.

14

Under Article IX of the California Constitution and in the

15

absence of any contrary authority, this Court concludes that

16

neither UCSF or its Medical Center is an independent legal entity

17

capable of being sued.

18

California, No. 16-cv-01390-KJM, 2016 WL 6875911, at *3 (E.D.

19

Cal. Nov. 21, 2016) (“the real party in interest in all suits

20

against components of the U.C. system is the Regents”).

21

Accordingly, the Court dismisses all claims against UCSF with

22

prejudice.1

23
24

See Mihan v. Regents of the Univ. of

A summons will not issue.

Plaintiff-Relator previously dismissed her claims against
the Regents.

The Court notes, however, that it would not in any

25
1

26
27
28

Plaintiff-Relator failed timely to serve UCSF within the
ninety days provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 4(m)
or within the additional time granted by this Court on October
12, 2017. She belatedly submitted a proposed summons on October
30, 2017, but did not show good cause for any further extension
of time. This further supports dismissal without prejudice.
3

1

case need to reach the question of Eleventh Amendment immunity

2

because a state agency such as the Regents is not a “person” who

3

may be sued by a private individual in a qui tam civil action

4

under the FCA.

5

Stevens, 529 U.S. 765, 787–88 (2000) (state agency not a “person”

6

for purposes of FCA); Donald v. Univ. of California Bd. of

7

Regents, 329 F.3d 1040, 1044 (9th Cir. 2003) (applying Stevens to

8

FCA Medicare fraud claims against Regents).

Vermont Agency of Nat. Res. v. U.S. ex rel.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

9
10

CONCLUSION
Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE all claims

11

against Defendant UCSF pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

12

Procedure 4(m).

13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15

Dated:

July 3, 2018
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4