Prasad v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage

Filing 33

FURTHER ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SANCTIONS ON PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL; ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER AND SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING AND STATUS REPORT DEADLINE. Show Cause Response due by 12/22/2016. Compliance hearing set Friday, 1/27/17at 9:01AM. Joint Statement filed 1/20/17. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/16/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 SUNIL PRASAD, Plaintiff, 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, Case No.16-cv-04941-YGR FURTHER ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SANCTIONS ON PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL; ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER AND SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING AND STATUS REPORT DEADLINE Defendant. The Court issues this FURTHER ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why plaintiff’s counsel Erickson 15 M. Davis should not be required to pay monetary sanctions in the amount of $574.32 to defendant’s 16 counsel Viddell Lee Heard. 17 On November 29, 2016, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause (Dkt. No. 23) why the 18 parties should not be sanctioned for their failure to file timely either their joint case management 19 statement, or the joint statement regarding the status of ADR efforts as ordered by the Court on 20 November 10, 2016. In that Order to Show Cause, the Court noted that Plaintiff had failed to 21 comply with a Court order previously and been subject to an order to show cause regarding 22 sanctions, which the Court subsequently vacated based upon plaintiff’s counsel’s explanation and 23 apology. The Order to Show Cause directed the parties to file a joint case management statement 24 and a written response to the Order to Show Cause no later than December 2, 2016. The Court noted 25 that it would only take the Monday, December 12, 2016 hearing off calendar if it was satisfied with 26 the responses, and that otherwise lead trial counsel would be required to appear at the hearing. 27 Finally, the Order to Show Cause stated that failure to comply would be deemed an admission that 28 1 2 monetary sanctions should be imposed. Plaintiff’s counsel did not file a response to the Order to Show cause by December 2, 2016. 3 Counsel failed to do so despite a reminder from defendant’s counsel on December 1 that such a 4 response was required by December 2. (See Declaration of Videll Lee Heard, Dkt. No. 24, at ¶5.) 5 Plaintiff filed no response to the Order to Show Cause until December 8, 2016. (Dkt. No. 29.) 6 Further, Plaintiff’s counsel failed to appear at the case management conference and hearing on the 7 Order to Show Cause on December 13, 2016. 8 The Court intends to sanction plaintiff’s counsel in the amount of $574.32 to compensate to Videll Lee Heard, counsel for defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., for his expenses to appear on 10 December 12, 2016. Plaintiff’s counsel shall file a written statement responding to this Further 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 9 Order to Show Cause no later than December 22, 2016. 12 OTHER ORDERS 13 14 15 Plaintiff’s counsel is further ORDERED to meet and confer with defendant’s counsel in person at defense counsel’s office no later than January 13, 2017. The Court SETS this matter for a compliance hearing on Friday, January 27, 2017, at 9:01 16 a.m. The parties’ shall file a joint status report on their meet and confer efforts no later than 17 January 20, 2017. If the statement is filed timely, the compliance hearing will be taken off 18 calendar. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: December 16, 2016 21 22 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?