Ojmar US, LLC v. Security People, Inc. et al
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING DEFENDANTS' RENEWED 135 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OJMAR US, LLC,
SECURITY PEOPLE, INC., et al.,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS'
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Re: Dkt. No. 135
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 16-cv-04948-HSG
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ renewed administrative motion to file under seal
documents associated with Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s
second amended complaint. Dkt. No. 135 (“Mot.”) at 1. In its order of November 29, 2017, the
Court denied in part Plaintiff’s unopposed motion to seal, finding that Plaintiff’s sealing request
was not narrowly tailored as applied to three confidential business agreements. See Dkt. No. 134
at 3–4.1 As the party claiming confidentiality, Defendants have resubmitted this request, and
complied with the Court’s prior order. See id.; Mot. at 1. The Court finds that the versions of the
documents now sought to be sealed are narrowly tailored and contain confidential business
information. See id.; In re Qualcomm Litig., No. 3:17-CV-0108-GPC-MDD, 2017 WL 5176922,
at *2 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2017). The Court therefore GRANTS Defendants’ renewed
administrative motion to seal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
The Court detailed the applicable legal standards in its prior sealing order, and incorporates that
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?