Ojmar US, LLC v. Security People, Inc. et al

Filing 98

Discovery Order re Joint Letter Brief 95 . Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 7/7/2017. (mejlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 OJMAR US, LLC, Case No. 16-cv-04948-HSG (MEJ) Plaintiff, 8 DISCOVERY ORDER v. Re: Dkt. No. 95 9 10 SECURITY PEOPLE, INC., et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Pending before the Court is a joint discovery letter brief filed by the parties. Jt. Ltr. Br., 14 Dkt. No. 95. The Court has addressed the factual background of this action and applicable legal 15 standards in earlier orders (see Dkt. Nos. 66, 78, 83, 84), and does not repeat those discussions 16 here. Having considered the parties’ positions, the relevant legal authority, and the record in this 17 case, the Court orders the following: 18 Interrogatories 1-3 are overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent they ask 19 Defendants to identify “any and all facts, documents and/or witnesses that support or contradict 20 each identified defense.” Defendants shall otherwise respond to Interrogatories 1-3 by identifying 21 the defense(s) they intend to offer and the facts Defendants contend support those defenses. 22 23 Defendants shall identify the specific records they have produced from which Plaintiff can derive the information requested in Interrogatories 8 and 9. 24 Defendants shall provide these responses within two weeks of the date of this Order. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: July 7, 2017 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?