Ojmar US, LLC v. Security People, Inc. et al

Filing 98

Discovery Order re Joint Letter Brief 95 . Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 7/7/2017. (mejlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

OJMAR US, LLC,

Case No. 16-cv-04948-HSG (MEJ)

Plaintiff,
8

DISCOVERY ORDER

v.

Re: Dkt. No. 95

9
10

SECURITY PEOPLE, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

Pending before the Court is a joint discovery letter brief filed by the parties. Jt. Ltr. Br.,

14

Dkt. No. 95. The Court has addressed the factual background of this action and applicable legal

15

standards in earlier orders (see Dkt. Nos. 66, 78, 83, 84), and does not repeat those discussions

16

here. Having considered the parties’ positions, the relevant legal authority, and the record in this

17

case, the Court orders the following:

18

Interrogatories 1-3 are overbroad and unduly burdensome to the extent they ask

19

Defendants to identify “any and all facts, documents and/or witnesses that support or contradict

20

each identified defense.” Defendants shall otherwise respond to Interrogatories 1-3 by identifying

21

the defense(s) they intend to offer and the facts Defendants contend support those defenses.

22
23

Defendants shall identify the specific records they have produced from which Plaintiff can
derive the information requested in Interrogatories 8 and 9.

24

Defendants shall provide these responses within two weeks of the date of this Order.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: July 7, 2017
______________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge