Vigdor et al v. Super Lucky Casino, Inc. et al
Filing
177
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 176 Stipulation. Motions due by 12/18/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP
BENEDICT Y. HUR - # 224018
bhur@keker.com
JULIA L. ALLEN - # 286097
jallen@keker.com
SHAYNE HENRY - # 300188
shenry@keker.com
SARAH SALOMON - # 308770
ssalomon@keker.com
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone:
415 391 5400
Facsimile:
415 397 7188
Attorneys for Defendants
SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC., NICHOLAS TALARICO,
AND BRET TERRILL
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
OAKLAND DIVISION
13
14
DAN VIGDOR, an individual; STEPHEN
BRADWAY, an individual,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiffs,
v.
SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC., a
California corporation (formerly known as
12 GIGS, INC.); Nicholas Talarico, an
individual; Bret Terrill, an individual; DOES
2-50, inclusive,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE DEFENDANTS SUPER
LUCKY CASINO, INC., NICHOLAS
TALARICO, AND BRET TERRILL’S
DEADLINE TO FILE A MOTION FOR
AWARD OF REASONABLE
ATTORNEYS’ FEES
AND EXPENSES
Dept.:
Judge:
2
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Date Filed: September 19, 2016
Trial Date: December 10, 2018
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS SUPER LUCKY CASINO, INC.,
NICHOLAS TALARICO, AND BRET TERRILL’S DEADLINE TO FILE A MOTION FOR AWARD OF
REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES
Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG
1312784.v1
1
2
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the undersigned parties to this action, by and through their
undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
3
4
WHEREAS, on November 20, 2018, the Court granted summary judgment to Defendants
on all of Plaintiffs’ causes of action, Dkt. 173;
5
6
WHEREAS, the Court entered final judgment in favor of Defendants on that same date,
Dkt. 175;
7
WHEREAS, pursuant to Civ. Local Rule 54-1, Defendants’ deadline to file a bill of costs
8
is December 4, 2018, which is 14 days after entry of judgment by the Court on November 20,
9
2018;
10
11
12
13
14
WHEREAS, pursuant to Civ. Local Rule 54-5, Defendants’ deadline to file a motion
seeking the award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses is also December 4, 2018;
WHEREAS, these deadlines have not been previously extended and their extension as
stipulated will not otherwise affect the schedule for this case;
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES, subject to the
15
Court’s Order, that Defendants deadline to file their bill of costs and motion for an award of
16
reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses shall be extended from December 4, 2018 to December
17
18, 2018.
18
19
20
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that all signatories
have concurred in its filing.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
21
22
AS STIPULATED BY:
23
24
25
Dated: December 3, 2018
KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP
By:
/s/ Benedict Y. Hur
26
27
28
1312784.v1
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS SUPER LUCKY CASINO, INC.,
NICHOLAS TALARICO, AND BRET TERRILL’S DEADLINE TO FILE A MOTION FOR AWARD OF
REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES
Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG
1
BENEDICT Y. HUR
JULIA L. ALLEN
SHAYNE HENRY
SARAH SALOMON
2
3
Attorneys for Defendants
SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC.,
NICHOLAS TALARICO,
AND BRET TERRILL
4
5
6
Dated: December 3, 2018
MICHELMAN & ROBINSON, LLP
7
8
By:
9
10
/s/ Marc R. Jacobs
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DAN VIGDOR and
STEPHEN BRADWAY
11
12
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
Dated: 12/4/2018
15
16
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1312784.v1
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS SUPER LUCKY CASINO, INC.,
NICHOLAS TALARICO, AND BRET TERRILL’S DEADLINE TO FILE A MOTION FOR AWARD OF
REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES
Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?