Vigdor et al v. Super Lucky Casino, Inc. et al

Filing 177

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 176 Stipulation. Motions due by 12/18/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP BENEDICT Y. HUR - # 224018 bhur@keker.com JULIA L. ALLEN - # 286097 jallen@keker.com SHAYNE HENRY - # 300188 shenry@keker.com SARAH SALOMON - # 308770 ssalomon@keker.com 633 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 Telephone: 415 391 5400 Facsimile: 415 397 7188 Attorneys for Defendants SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC., NICHOLAS TALARICO, AND BRET TERRILL 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 OAKLAND DIVISION 13 14 DAN VIGDOR, an individual; STEPHEN BRADWAY, an individual, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiffs, v. SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC., a California corporation (formerly known as 12 GIGS, INC.); Nicholas Talarico, an individual; Bret Terrill, an individual; DOES 2-50, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS SUPER LUCKY CASINO, INC., NICHOLAS TALARICO, AND BRET TERRILL’S DEADLINE TO FILE A MOTION FOR AWARD OF REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES Dept.: Judge: 2 Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Date Filed: September 19, 2016 Trial Date: December 10, 2018 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS SUPER LUCKY CASINO, INC., NICHOLAS TALARICO, AND BRET TERRILL’S DEADLINE TO FILE A MOTION FOR AWARD OF REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG 1312784.v1 1 2 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the undersigned parties to this action, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 3 4 WHEREAS, on November 20, 2018, the Court granted summary judgment to Defendants on all of Plaintiffs’ causes of action, Dkt. 173; 5 6 WHEREAS, the Court entered final judgment in favor of Defendants on that same date, Dkt. 175; 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to Civ. Local Rule 54-1, Defendants’ deadline to file a bill of costs 8 is December 4, 2018, which is 14 days after entry of judgment by the Court on November 20, 9 2018; 10 11 12 13 14 WHEREAS, pursuant to Civ. Local Rule 54-5, Defendants’ deadline to file a motion seeking the award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses is also December 4, 2018; WHEREAS, these deadlines have not been previously extended and their extension as stipulated will not otherwise affect the schedule for this case; IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES, subject to the 15 Court’s Order, that Defendants deadline to file their bill of costs and motion for an award of 16 reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses shall be extended from December 4, 2018 to December 17 18, 2018. 18 19 20 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that all signatories have concurred in its filing. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 21 22 AS STIPULATED BY: 23 24 25 Dated: December 3, 2018 KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP By: /s/ Benedict Y. Hur 26 27 28 1312784.v1 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS SUPER LUCKY CASINO, INC., NICHOLAS TALARICO, AND BRET TERRILL’S DEADLINE TO FILE A MOTION FOR AWARD OF REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG 1 BENEDICT Y. HUR JULIA L. ALLEN SHAYNE HENRY SARAH SALOMON 2 3 Attorneys for Defendants SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC., NICHOLAS TALARICO, AND BRET TERRILL 4 5 6 Dated: December 3, 2018 MICHELMAN & ROBINSON, LLP 7 8 By: 9 10 /s/ Marc R. Jacobs Attorneys for Plaintiffs DAN VIGDOR and STEPHEN BRADWAY 11 12 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 Dated: 12/4/2018 15 16 Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1312784.v1 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANTS SUPER LUCKY CASINO, INC., NICHOLAS TALARICO, AND BRET TERRILL’S DEADLINE TO FILE A MOTION FOR AWARD OF REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?