Vigdor et al v. Super Lucky Casino, Inc. et al

Filing 48

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 47 Stipulation to Extend Defendants Deadline to Respond to Plaintiffs Motion to Lift PSLRA Stay and Plaintiffs Deadline to Reply. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP BENEDICT Y. HUR - # 224018 bhur@keker.com JULIA L. ALLEN - # 286097 jallen@keker.com 633 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 Telephone: 415 391 5400 Facsimile: 415 397 7188 Attorneys for Defendants SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC. and NICHOLAS TALARICO 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 DAN VIGDOR, an individual; STEPHEN BRADWAY, an individual, Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 18 v. SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC., a California corporation (formerly known as 12 GIGS, INC.); NICHOLAS TALARICO, an individual; DOES 1-50, inclusive, Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO LIFT PSLRA STAY AND PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO REPLY AND ORDER Date Filed: 9/1/2016 Trial Date: None Set Defendants. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG 1168839 1 2 3 The undersigned parties to this action, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a complaint in the above-entitled action in the United States 4 District Court, Northern District of California, on September 16, 2016 (the “Complaint”) and 5 filed the Certificate of Service of the Complaint on Defendants on October 5, 2016; 6 WHEREAS, on October 13, 2016, Defendants filed a Stipulation to Extend Time to 7 Respond to the Complaint, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), which extended Defendants’ time 8 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint 18 days to November 1, 2016; 9 10 11 WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on November 1, 2016, scheduled for hearing on January 19, 2017; WHEREAS, on November 15, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a Stipulation to Extend Time to File 12 First Amended Complaint and Vacate Motion to Dismiss Hearing Date Upon Filing of First 13 Amended Complaint, which extended Plaintiffs’ time to file the First Amended Complaint 7 days 14 to November 29, 2016 and Defendants’ deadline to file a response to the First Amended 15 Complaint to December 15, 2016; 16 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on November 29, 2016; 17 WHEREAS, on December 7, 2016, Defendants filed a Stipulation Extending Time for 18 Defendants to Respond to First Amended Complaint, which extended Defendants’ time to answer 19 or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint 7 days to December 22, 2016 and extended 20 Plaintiffs’ time to file any opposition 7 days to January 12, 2017; 21 22 23 WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint on December 22, 2016, scheduled for hearing on March 2, 2017; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Stipulation to Extend Time to File Plaintiffs’ Response to 24 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, and To Extend Time to File Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiffs’ 25 Response on December 23, 2016, and pursuant to stipulation, on December 27, 2016, the Court 26 extended Plaintiffs’ deadline to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 12 days to January 17, 27 2017 and Defendants’ deadline to respond to Plaintiffs’ Response 12 days to January 24, 2017; 28 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Motion and Notice of Motion to Partially Lift PSLRA 1 STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG 1168839 1 Discovery Stay to Conduct Limited Scope Discovery on May 26, 2017 with a hearing date of July 2 6, 2017; 3 IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES that, provided that 4 the July 6, 2017 hearing date remains unchanged, Defendants’ time to respond to Plaintiffs’ 5 Motion and Notice of Motion to Partially Lift PSLRA Discovery Stay to Conduct Limited Scope 6 Discovery (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”) is extended seven days, up to and including June 16, 2017, and 7 Plaintiffs’ time to file their reply in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion is extended seven days, up to 8 and including June 23, 2017. This stipulation alters the date of the deadlines fixed by the court on 9 May 26, 2017, which ordered Defendants’ Response due by June 9, 2017 and Plaintiffs’ Replies 10 due by June 16, 2017. Plaintiffs agreed to this stipulation expressly subject to the condition that 11 and only if this stipulation does not impact or cause to be changed the July 6, 2017 hearing date 12 on Plaintiffs’ Motion. 13 14 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that all signatories have concurred in its filing. 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 AS STIPULATED BY: 17 Dated: June 2, 2017 KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP 18 19 By: 20 /s/ Benedict Y. Hur BENEDICT Y. HUR JULIA L ALLEN Attorneys for Defendants SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC. and NICHOLAS TALARICO 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG 1168839 1 MICHELMAN & ROBINSON, LLP Dated: June 2, 2017 2 3 By: 4 5 6 /s/ Marc R. Jacobs SANFORD L. MICHELMAN RYAN HONG MARC R. JACOBS BENJAMIN HORWITZ Attorneys for Plaintiffs DAN VIGDOR and STEPHEN BRADWAY 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG 1168839 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, Defendants’ time to respond to 3 Plaintiffs’ Motion and Notice of Motion to Partially Lift PSLRA Discovery Stay to Conduct 4 Limited Scope Discovery is extended to June 16, 2017, and Plaintiffs’ time to file their reply in 5 support of Plaintiffs’ Motion is extended to June 23, 2017. The hearing date shall remain July 6, 6 2017 as originally noticed. 7 8 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 Dated: June 9, 2017 11 12 13 HON. JUDGE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG 1168839

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?