Vigdor et al v. Super Lucky Casino, Inc. et al
Filing
48
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 47 Stipulation to Extend Defendants Deadline to Respond to Plaintiffs Motion to Lift PSLRA Stay and Plaintiffs Deadline to Reply. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP
BENEDICT Y. HUR - # 224018
bhur@keker.com
JULIA L. ALLEN - # 286097
jallen@keker.com
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone:
415 391 5400
Facsimile:
415 397 7188
Attorneys for Defendants
SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC. and NICHOLAS TALARICO
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
DAN VIGDOR, an individual; STEPHEN
BRADWAY, an individual,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
17
18
v.
SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC., a
California corporation (formerly known as
12 GIGS, INC.); NICHOLAS TALARICO,
an individual; DOES 1-50, inclusive,
Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND
DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
TO LIFT PSLRA STAY AND
PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO REPLY
AND ORDER
Date Filed: 9/1/2016
Trial Date: None Set
Defendants.
Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG
1168839
1
2
3
The undersigned parties to this action, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby
agree and stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a complaint in the above-entitled action in the United States
4
District Court, Northern District of California, on September 16, 2016 (the “Complaint”) and
5
filed the Certificate of Service of the Complaint on Defendants on October 5, 2016;
6
WHEREAS, on October 13, 2016, Defendants filed a Stipulation to Extend Time to
7
Respond to the Complaint, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), which extended Defendants’ time
8
to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint 18 days to November 1, 2016;
9
10
11
WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on November 1, 2016, scheduled for
hearing on January 19, 2017;
WHEREAS, on November 15, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a Stipulation to Extend Time to File
12
First Amended Complaint and Vacate Motion to Dismiss Hearing Date Upon Filing of First
13
Amended Complaint, which extended Plaintiffs’ time to file the First Amended Complaint 7 days
14
to November 29, 2016 and Defendants’ deadline to file a response to the First Amended
15
Complaint to December 15, 2016;
16
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on November 29, 2016;
17
WHEREAS, on December 7, 2016, Defendants filed a Stipulation Extending Time for
18
Defendants to Respond to First Amended Complaint, which extended Defendants’ time to answer
19
or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint 7 days to December 22, 2016 and extended
20
Plaintiffs’ time to file any opposition 7 days to January 12, 2017;
21
22
23
WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint on
December 22, 2016, scheduled for hearing on March 2, 2017;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Stipulation to Extend Time to File Plaintiffs’ Response to
24
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, and To Extend Time to File Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiffs’
25
Response on December 23, 2016, and pursuant to stipulation, on December 27, 2016, the Court
26
extended Plaintiffs’ deadline to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss 12 days to January 17,
27
2017 and Defendants’ deadline to respond to Plaintiffs’ Response 12 days to January 24, 2017;
28
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Motion and Notice of Motion to Partially Lift PSLRA
1
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG
1168839
1
Discovery Stay to Conduct Limited Scope Discovery on May 26, 2017 with a hearing date of July
2
6, 2017;
3
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES that, provided that
4
the July 6, 2017 hearing date remains unchanged, Defendants’ time to respond to Plaintiffs’
5
Motion and Notice of Motion to Partially Lift PSLRA Discovery Stay to Conduct Limited Scope
6
Discovery (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”) is extended seven days, up to and including June 16, 2017, and
7
Plaintiffs’ time to file their reply in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion is extended seven days, up to
8
and including June 23, 2017. This stipulation alters the date of the deadlines fixed by the court on
9
May 26, 2017, which ordered Defendants’ Response due by June 9, 2017 and Plaintiffs’ Replies
10
due by June 16, 2017. Plaintiffs agreed to this stipulation expressly subject to the condition that
11
and only if this stipulation does not impact or cause to be changed the July 6, 2017 hearing date
12
on Plaintiffs’ Motion.
13
14
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that all signatories
have concurred in its filing.
15
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
16
AS STIPULATED BY:
17
Dated: June 2, 2017
KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP
18
19
By:
20
/s/ Benedict Y. Hur
BENEDICT Y. HUR
JULIA L ALLEN
Attorneys for Defendants
SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC. and
NICHOLAS TALARICO
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG
1168839
1
MICHELMAN & ROBINSON, LLP
Dated: June 2, 2017
2
3
By:
4
5
6
/s/ Marc R. Jacobs
SANFORD L. MICHELMAN
RYAN HONG
MARC R. JACOBS
BENJAMIN HORWITZ
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DAN VIGDOR and
STEPHEN BRADWAY
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG
1168839
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, Defendants’ time to respond to
3
Plaintiffs’ Motion and Notice of Motion to Partially Lift PSLRA Discovery Stay to Conduct
4
Limited Scope Discovery is extended to June 16, 2017, and Plaintiffs’ time to file their reply in
5
support of Plaintiffs’ Motion is extended to June 23, 2017. The hearing date shall remain July 6,
6
2017 as originally noticed.
7
8
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated: June 9, 2017
11
12
13
HON. JUDGE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG
1168839
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?