Vigdor et al v. Super Lucky Casino, Inc. et al

Filing 53

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 50 Motion for Extension of Time to File Document Regarding Completion of ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP BENEDICT Y. HUR - # 224018 bhur@keker.com JULIA L ALLEN - # 286097 jallen@keker.com 633 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1809 Telephone: 415 391 5400 Facsimile: 415 397 7188 Attorneys for Defendants SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC. and NICHOLAS TALARICO 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 DAN VIGDOR, an individual; STEPHEN BRADWAY, an individual, Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE v. SUPER LUCKY CASINO INC., a California corporation (formerly known as 12 GIGS, INC.); NICHOLAS TALARICO, an individual; DOES 1-50, inclusive, Dept.: Judge: Courtroom 2 - 4th Floor Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Date Filed: 9/1/2016 Trial Date: None Set Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE Case No. 4:16-cv-5326 HSG 1173189 1 2 The Court, having considered Defendants Motion to Extend the A C g d s’ ADR Deadli and the ine, parties’ positi ions and arguments relat thereto fi ted finds: 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defenda O ants’ Motion to Extend A n ADR Deadlin is ne 4 GRANTED for the reason stated in their moving papers, and the July 5, 2017 ADR deadline is G f ns t g d 5 ta aken off cale endar. The Court will se a new ADR deadline, as needed, a part of the case C et R as e 6 sc chedule. 7 8 9 10 11 12 RED. IT IS SO ORDER Dated: June 22, 2017 D 2 HO HAYW ON. WOOD S. GI ILLIAM, JR R. UN NITED STA ATED DISTRICT COUR JUDGE RT 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED ORDER GR D] RANTING MO OTION TO EX XTEND ADR D DEADLINE Case No. 4:16 6-cv-5326 HSG G 11731 189

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?