Abdul-Haqq v. Kaiser Emergency In San Leandro

Filing 14

ORDER Regarding Service of 10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Vacating January 4, 2017 Hearing. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/27/2016. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2016)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 JAMILAH ABDUL-HAQQ, Case No. 16-cv-05454-PJH Plaintiff, 5 v. ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF MOTION TO DISMISS 6 7 8 KAISER EMERGENCY IN SAN LEANDRO, Re: Dkt. No. 10 Defendant. 9 Pro se plaintiff Jamilah Abdul-Haqq has been granted permission for electronic 10 filing in this case. Dkt. 4. However, it appears that plaintiff’s email address was not 11 United States District Court Northern District of California added to the docket, such that she has not been receiving electronic notice of filings in 12 this matter. Although plaintiff was not required to re-register with ECF, she apparently 13 neglected to email the ECF desk to be added to this case. See E-filing Registration 14 Instructions for Pro Se Litigants, https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ECF/proseregistration 15 (Step 3). As a result, it does not appear that plaintiff was served with defendant’s motion 16 to dismiss (Dkt. 10). Plaintiff has not responded, likely for this reason. 17 The Clerk shall add plaintiff’s email address (jabdulhaqqedocs@comcast.net) to 18 the service list in this matter. In light of the failure of service, the motion hearing noticed 19 for January 4, 2017 is hereby VACATED. Defendant shall serve its motion to dismiss on 20 21 plaintiff and re-notice a new hearing date in accordance with the court’s 35-day schedule. In light of defendant’s motion, the court hereby VACATES the initial case 22 management conference scheduled for January 19, 2016. The court will reschedule a 23 CMC once the pleadings are resolved. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: December 27, 2016 26 27 28 __________________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?