Abdul-Haqq v. Kaiser Emergency In San Leandro
Filing
14
ORDER Regarding Service of 10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Vacating January 4, 2017 Hearing. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/27/2016. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2016)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
JAMILAH ABDUL-HAQQ,
Case No. 16-cv-05454-PJH
Plaintiff,
5
v.
ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF
MOTION TO DISMISS
6
7
8
KAISER EMERGENCY IN SAN
LEANDRO,
Re: Dkt. No. 10
Defendant.
9
Pro se plaintiff Jamilah Abdul-Haqq has been granted permission for electronic
10
filing in this case. Dkt. 4. However, it appears that plaintiff’s email address was not
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
added to the docket, such that she has not been receiving electronic notice of filings in
12
this matter. Although plaintiff was not required to re-register with ECF, she apparently
13
neglected to email the ECF desk to be added to this case. See E-filing Registration
14
Instructions for Pro Se Litigants, https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ECF/proseregistration
15
(Step 3). As a result, it does not appear that plaintiff was served with defendant’s motion
16
to dismiss (Dkt. 10). Plaintiff has not responded, likely for this reason.
17
The Clerk shall add plaintiff’s email address (jabdulhaqqedocs@comcast.net) to
18
the service list in this matter. In light of the failure of service, the motion hearing noticed
19
for January 4, 2017 is hereby VACATED. Defendant shall serve its motion to dismiss on
20
21
plaintiff and re-notice a new hearing date in accordance with the court’s 35-day schedule.
In light of defendant’s motion, the court hereby VACATES the initial case
22
management conference scheduled for January 19, 2016. The court will reschedule a
23
CMC once the pleadings are resolved.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: December 27, 2016
26
27
28
__________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?