Peter Schuman et al v. Microchip Technology Incorporated et al

Filing 142

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #141 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Re #134 MOTION for Summary Judgment and #139 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 9/28/2020 and Replies due by 10/5/2020. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2020)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

13
14
Esplanade Center III, Suite 800
2415 East Camelback Road
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Telephone: [phone]

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

12

15
16
17
18
19

PETER SCHUMAN, an individual, and,
No. 4:16-CV-005544-HSG
WILLIAM COMPLIN, an individual, on
behalf of themselves and on behalf of others CLASS ACTION
similarly situated,
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
Plaintiffs,
TIME FOR PARTIES TO RESPOND TO
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v.
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY
INCORPORATED, a corporation; ATMEL
CORPORATION, a corporation; and ATMEL
CORPORATION U.S. SEVERANCE
GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM, an
employee benefit plan,
Defendants.

Hearing Date:
October 15, 2020
Time:
2:00 p.m.
Courtroom: Oakland Courthouse, Courtroom 2
Action Filed:
September 29, 2016
Trial Date:
February 8, 2021
Judge:
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

20
21

Based upon the Defendants’ Motion, and good cause otherwise appearing, it is ordered that

22

the deadline for Defendants to respond Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and the deadline

23

for Plaintiffs to response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is extended up and to

24

September 28, 2020. Reply briefs for both sides will be due October 5, 2020.

25
26
27
28

DATED 9/24/2020
By:
Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
U.S. District Court Judge for the Northern
District of California
44335924.1

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES
TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. 4:16-cv-005544