Peter Schuman et al v. Microchip Technology Incorporated et al
Filing
79
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #78 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #76 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaims: Responses due by 7/16/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 PETER SCHUMAN, an individual, and,
9
10
WILLIAM COMPLIN, an individual, on
behalf of themselves and on behalf of others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
11
12
v.
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY
No. 4:16-CV-005544-HSG
CLASS ACTION
ORDER GRANTING UNDISPUTED
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
COUNTERCLAIM
13 INCORPORATED, a corporation; ATMEL
14 CORPORATION, a corporation; and ATMEL
15
CORPORATION U.S. SEVERANCE
GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM, an
employee benefit plan,
16
Defendants.
17
Hearing Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
August 30, 2018
2:00 p.m.
2, Floor 4
Action Filed:
Trial Date:
September 29, 2016
None Set
18
19
Upon consideration of Defendants’ Undisputed Motion for Extension for Defendants to
20 Respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim, and good cause appearing,
21
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Opposition shall be filed no later than July 16, 2018.
22
23
24
25
Dated: June 14, 2018
JUDGE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
26
27
34451573.1
28
ORDER GRANTING UNDISPUTED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS
Case No. 4:16-cv-005544-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?