Peter Schuman et al v. Microchip Technology Incorporated et al

Filing 79

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #78 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #76 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaims: Responses due by 7/16/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 PETER SCHUMAN, an individual, and, 9 10 WILLIAM COMPLIN, an individual, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 11 12 v. MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY No. 4:16-CV-005544-HSG CLASS ACTION ORDER GRANTING UNDISPUTED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM 13 INCORPORATED, a corporation; ATMEL 14 CORPORATION, a corporation; and ATMEL 15 CORPORATION U.S. SEVERANCE GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM, an employee benefit plan, 16 Defendants. 17 Hearing Date: Time: Courtroom: August 30, 2018 2:00 p.m. 2, Floor 4 Action Filed: Trial Date: September 29, 2016 None Set 18 19 Upon consideration of Defendants’ Undisputed Motion for Extension for Defendants to 20 Respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim, and good cause appearing, 21 IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Opposition shall be filed no later than July 16, 2018. 22 23 24 25 Dated: June 14, 2018 JUDGE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 26 27 34451573.1 28 ORDER GRANTING UNDISPUTED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS Case No. 4:16-cv-005544-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?