Peter Schuman et al v. Microchip Technology Incorporated et al

Filing 83

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #82 Stipulation to Consolidate Hearings. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., SBN 00504800 Mark G. Kisicki (CA SBN 150057) mark.kisicki@ogletreedeakins.com Elizabeth M. Townsend (AZ SBN 024009) admitted pro hac vice elizabeth.townsend@ogletreedeakins.com 2415 E. Camelback Road, Suite 800 Phoenix, AZ 85016 Telephone: 602.778.3700 Fax: 602.778.3750 6 7 8 9 10 Mark Schmidtke (IN SBN 1733-45), admitted pro hac vice 56 S. Washington Street, Suite 302 Valparaiso, IN 46383 Tel.: 219.242.8668 Fax: 219.242.8669 mark.schmidtke@ogletreedeakins.com Attorneys for Defendants 11 *Counsel for Plaintiffs on the following page 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 PETER SCHUMAN, an individual, and WILLIAM COPLIN, an individual, on behalf of 18 themselves and on behalf of others similarly situated, 19 Plaintiffs, 20 v. 21 MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY 22 INCORPORATED, a corporation; ATMEL CORPORATION, a corporation; and ATMEL 23 CORPORATION U.S. SEVERANCE GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM, an 24 employee benefit plan, 25 Defendants Case No. 4:16-CV-05544-HSG CLASS ACTION STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE HEARINGS [Civ. L.R. 6-2] Hearing Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: August 30, 2018 2:00 p.m. 2, Floor 4 Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Action Filed: Trial Date: September 29, 2016 None Set 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE HEARINGS 4:16-CV-05544-HSG 1 PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSEL: 2 Michael Rubin (SBN 80618) Andrew Kushner (SBN 316035) ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 177 Post Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 421-7151 Facsimile: (415) 362-8064 mrubin@altber.com akushner@altber.com 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Cliff Palefsky (SBN 77683) Keith Ehrman (SBN 106985) MCGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY 535 Pacific Avenue San Francisco, CA 94133 Telephone: (415) 421-9292 Facsimile: (415) 403-0202 cp@mhpsf.com keith@mhpsf.com William B. Reilly (SBN 177550) LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM REILLY 86 Molino Avenue Mill Valley, CA 94941 Telephone: (415) 225-6215 Facsimile: (415) 634-2897 Email: bill@williambreilly.com 17 18 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE HEARINGS 4:16-CV-05544-HSG 2 1 Plaintiffs Peter Schuman and William Coplin (collectively “Schuman Plaintiffs”) filed a 2 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims on May 31, 2018. The deadline for Defendants Microchip 3 Technology Incorporated (“Microchip”), Atmel Corporation (“Atmel”) and Atmel Corporation 4 U.S. Severance Guarantee Benefit Program (“Severance Program” and, collectively with 5 Microchip and Atmel, “Defendants”) to respond to that motion is July 16, 2018. Plaintiffs’ reply in 6 support of the motion is due on July 23, 2018. A hearing on the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims 7 is currently scheduled for August 30, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. 8 In the related case of Berman et al. v. Microchip Technology Incorporated et al., 4:17-cv- 9 01864-HSG, Plaintiffs Robin Berman, Bo Kang, Khashayar Mirfakhraei, Thang Van Vu, Donna 10 Viera-Castillo, Girish Ramesh, Patrick Hanley, Ilana Shternshain and Mandy Schwarz filed a 11 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on July 2, 2018 and noticed the hearing for September 13, 12 2018 at 2:00 p.m. Plaintiffs in the Berman action are represented by the same attorneys who 13 represent the Schuman Plaintiffs. Defendants are the same in both actions. 14 In the interest of efficiency, the Schuman Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their 15 respective attorneys of record, request the Court consolidate the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss 16 Counterclaims filed in the Schuman case with the hearing on the Motion for Partial Summary 17 Judgment filed in the Berman case and hold a hearing on both motions on September 13, 2018 at 18 2:00 p.m. 19 20 21 22 23 24 Respectfully submitted July 13, 2018. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. By: /s/ Mark G. Kisicki Mark G. Kisicki Elizabeth N. Townsend admitted pro hac vice 2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 800 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE HEARINGS 4:16-CV-05544-HSG 3 1 4 Mark Schmidtke (IN SBN 1733-45), admitted pro hac vice 56 S. Washington Street, Suite 302 Valparaiso, IN 46383 Tel.: 219.242.8668 Fax: 219.242.8669 mark.schmidtke@ogletreedeakins.com 5 Attorneys for Defendants 2 3 6 ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 7 By: s/ Michael Rubin (with permission) Michael Rubin Andrew Kushner ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 177 Post Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94108 8 9 10 11 Cliff Palefsky Keith Ehrman MCGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY 535 Pacific Avenue San Francisco, CA 94133 12 13 14 William B. Reilly LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM REILLY 86 Molino Avenue Mill Valley, CA 94941 15 16 17 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18 19 20 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 21 22 23 24 25 In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document, and that this attestation was executed on July 13, 2018. By: /s/ Mark G. Kisicki 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE HEARINGS 4:16-CV-05544-HSG 4 1 2 3 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims in Schuman et al. v. Microchip 4 Technology Incorporated et al., 4:16-CV-05544-HSG shall be consolidated with the hearing on the 5 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in Berman et al. v. Microchip Technology Incorporated et 6 al., 4:17-cv-01864-HSG. A consolidated hearing on both motions shall take place on September 7 13, 2018 beginning at 2:00 p.m. 8 9 10 Dated: ______________________ 7/16/2018 ____________________________________ The Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE HEARINGS 4:16-CV-05544-HSG 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?