Mendoza v. High Performance Capital Inc. et al

Filing 34

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 9/20/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 9/12/2017. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ANTHONY M. MENDOZA,

Case No. 16-cv-05556-DMR

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

9
10

HIGH PERFORMANCE CAPITAL INC., et
al.,
Defendants.

12

Defendant High Performance Capital Inc. filed a motion for summary judgment on August

13

24, 2017. [Docket No. 31.] Currently, the motion is set for a court hearing on September 28,

14

2017. Plaintiff Anthony M. Mendoza is pursuing this action without legal representation.

15

According to the local court rules, Plaintiff should have filed any brief in opposition to

16

Defendant’s motion by September 7, 2017. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). The court has received no such

17

opposition.
The court ORDERS Plaintiff to respond by September 20, 2017 and explain his failure to

19

respond to the motion. In addition, Plaintiff must simultaneously (1) submit his opposition to the

20

court or (2) file a statement of non-opposition to the motion. This order to show cause does not

21

indicate that the court will necessarily accept Plaintiff’s late submission. If Plaintiff does not

22

respond by September 20, 2017, Defendant’s motion may be granted or the case may be dismissed

23

for failure to prosecute. The September 28, 2017 hearing on the motion for summary judgment is

24

VACATED and will be re-set, if necessary, following Plaintiff’s submission.

FO

LI

H

ER

R NIA

D

E
ORDER

______________________________________
u
Donna M. Ryu
a M. Ry
ge Judge
United States MagistrateDonn
Jud
RT

28

O
IT IS S

NO

27

Dated: September 12, 2017

A

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

25

S

18

UNIT
ED

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C