Mendoza v. High Performance Capital Inc. et al

Filing 34

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 9/20/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 9/12/2017. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANTHONY M. MENDOZA, Case No. 16-cv-05556-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 10 HIGH PERFORMANCE CAPITAL INC., et al., Defendants. 12 Defendant High Performance Capital Inc. filed a motion for summary judgment on August 13 24, 2017. [Docket No. 31.] Currently, the motion is set for a court hearing on September 28, 14 2017. Plaintiff Anthony M. Mendoza is pursuing this action without legal representation. 15 According to the local court rules, Plaintiff should have filed any brief in opposition to 16 Defendant’s motion by September 7, 2017. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). The court has received no such 17 opposition. The court ORDERS Plaintiff to respond by September 20, 2017 and explain his failure to 19 respond to the motion. In addition, Plaintiff must simultaneously (1) submit his opposition to the 20 court or (2) file a statement of non-opposition to the motion. This order to show cause does not 21 indicate that the court will necessarily accept Plaintiff’s late submission. If Plaintiff does not 22 respond by September 20, 2017, Defendant’s motion may be granted or the case may be dismissed 23 for failure to prosecute. The September 28, 2017 hearing on the motion for summary judgment is 24 VACATED and will be re-set, if necessary, following Plaintiff’s submission. FO LI H ER R NIA D E ORDER ______________________________________ u Donna M. Ryu a M. Ry ge Judge United States MagistrateDonn Jud RT 28 O IT IS S NO 27 Dated: September 12, 2017 A 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 25 S 18 UNIT ED United States District Court Northern District of California 11 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?