Teresa Aguirre v. State of California et al

Filing 163

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 162 Stipulation to Continue Pretrial Filing Deadline to July 25, 2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California KAREN KIYO LOWHURST Deputy Attorney General LISA J. PLANK Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 153737 1515 Clay Street, 20th Floor P.O. Box 70550 Oakland, CA 94612-0550 Telephone: (510) 879-1001 Fax: (510) 622-2270 E-mail: Lisa.Plank@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants State of California, et al. DEBORAH KOCHAN (S.B. # 152089) MATHEW STEPHENSON (S.B. #154330) KOCHAN & STEPHENSON 1680 Shattuck Avenue Berkeley, CA 94709 Telephone: (510) 649-1130 Fax: (510) 649-1131 ELIZABETH M. PECK (S.B. #277794) PECK LAW 111 North Market St., Ste. 300 San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 332-5792 Facsimile: (408) 332-5793 E-mail: lisa@peck-law.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Teresa Aguirre 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 21 22 TERESA AGUIRRE, 23 24 25 26 27 v. 4:16-cv-05564-HSG Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL FILING DEADLINE TO JULY 25, 2018 STATE OF CALIFORNIA; DEBRA MILLS, CARIANNE HUSS; and DOES 1 through 5, Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Trial Date: December 3, 2018 Defendants. Action Filed: September 30, 2016 28 1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Pretrial Filing Deadline to July 25, 2018 (4:16-cv-05564-HSG) 1 Following extensive good faith meet and confer, the parties jointly request a one-week 2 continuance of the July 18, 2018 pretrial filing deadline (for a revised statement of the case, 3 revised proposed jury instructions, and revised proposed voir dire questions per Dkt. No. 161), for 4 the following reasons. As reflected in Plaintiff’s trial availability schedule (Doc. 160), both 5 Plaintiff’s trial counsel are on vacation July 11 through 18. As reflected in Defendants’ trial 6 availability calendar (Doc. 159), defense lead counsel Lowhurst is on vacation for the period June 7 1- July 11, and DAG Plank is on vacation June 14 and 15, and from July 2 through 6. Therefore, 8 under the current schedule it is not possible for both lead counsel to jointly review and finalize the 9 pre-trial filings before the July 18 due date. Specifically, while the parties can, and will, prepare 10 draft documents in anticipation of a July 18th deadline, Defendant’s lead counsel (Lowhurst) will 11 not be able to review the filings until July 12, by which time all of Plaintiff’s counsel will be 12 absent. Should the Court allow, the parties stipulate to a one-week extension for the filing of the 13 revised statement of the case, revised proposed jury instructions, and revised proposed voir dire 14 questions, to July 25, 2018. 15 Dated: June 4, 2018 Respectfully submitted, 16 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California 17 /s/ Lisa J. Plank 18 LISA J. PLANK Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants State of California, et al. 19 20 21 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Pretrial Filing Deadline to July 25, 2018 (4:16-cv-05564-HSG) ATTESTATION 1 2 I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 3 obtained from Deborah Kochan. 4 Dated: June 4, 2018 Respectfully submitted, 5 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California 6 /s/ Lisa J. Plank 7 LISA J. PLANK Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants State of California, et al. 8 9 10 [Proposed] ORDER 11 12 Good cause appearing, the Stipulation Regarding Continuance of Pretrial Filing Deadline 13 to July 25, 2018, is hereby approved. 14 DATED: 6/5/2018 15 16 17 Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. U.S. District Court Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Continue Pretrial Filing Deadline to July 25, 2018 (4:16-cv-05564-HSG)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?