Coyle v. Equifax, Inc. et al
Filing
48
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Show Cause Response due by 6/9/2017. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/1/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DOUGLAS COYLE,
Plaintiff,
8
9
v.
10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
EQUIFAX, INC.,
Defendant.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 16-cv-05675-HSG
Re: Dkt. No. 34
12
13
On October 5, 2016, Plaintiff filed the present suit against Defendant Equifax, Inc.
14
(“Equifax”). See generally Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Defendant filed a motion to dismiss on
15
January 6, 2017, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Dkt. No. 34. To date,
16
Plaintiff has failed to oppose the motion.
In general, an opposition must be filed and served “not more than 14 days after the motion
17
18
was filed.” L.R. 7-3(a). The Court interprets a failure to oppose a motion to dismiss as a
19
concession that the original complaint should be dismissed. See Marziano v. Cty of Marin, No. C-
20
10-2740 EMC, 2010 WL 3895525, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2010) (interpreting plaintiff’s failure to
21
oppose defendant’s motion to dismiss as a concession that the claim at issue should be dismissed);
22
see also GN Resound A/S v. Callpod, Inc., No. C 11-04673 SBA, 2013 WL 1190651, at *5 (N.D.
23
Cal. Mar. 21, 2013) (construing plaintiff’s failure to oppose defendant’s argument as a concession
24
of that argument).
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
//
1
The Court thus ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause by June 9, 2017 why this case should not
2
be dismissed based on his failure to oppose Equifax’s pending motion to dismiss. See Marziano,
3
2010 WL 3895525, at *4.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 6/1/2017
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?