Coyle v. Equifax, Inc. et al

Filing 48

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. Show Cause Response due by 6/9/2017. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/1/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DOUGLAS COYLE, Plaintiff, 8 9 v. 10 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED EQUIFAX, INC., Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 16-cv-05675-HSG Re: Dkt. No. 34 12 13 On October 5, 2016, Plaintiff filed the present suit against Defendant Equifax, Inc. 14 (“Equifax”). See generally Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Defendant filed a motion to dismiss on 15 January 6, 2017, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Dkt. No. 34. To date, 16 Plaintiff has failed to oppose the motion. In general, an opposition must be filed and served “not more than 14 days after the motion 17 18 was filed.” L.R. 7-3(a). The Court interprets a failure to oppose a motion to dismiss as a 19 concession that the original complaint should be dismissed. See Marziano v. Cty of Marin, No. C- 20 10-2740 EMC, 2010 WL 3895525, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2010) (interpreting plaintiff’s failure to 21 oppose defendant’s motion to dismiss as a concession that the claim at issue should be dismissed); 22 see also GN Resound A/S v. Callpod, Inc., No. C 11-04673 SBA, 2013 WL 1190651, at *5 (N.D. 23 Cal. Mar. 21, 2013) (construing plaintiff’s failure to oppose defendant’s argument as a concession 24 of that argument). 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 The Court thus ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause by June 9, 2017 why this case should not 2 be dismissed based on his failure to oppose Equifax’s pending motion to dismiss. See Marziano, 3 2010 WL 3895525, at *4. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 6/1/2017 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?