King v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Filing
124
CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 9/14/17. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2017)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
KATHERINE KING,
Case No. 16-cv-05711-YGR
Plaintiff,
5
v.
CASE MANAGEMENT AND
PRETRIAL ORDER
6
7
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,
INC., et al.,
Defendants.
8
9
10
TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
The Court hereby sets the following trial and pretrial dates:
PRETRIAL SCHEDULE
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE:
Monday, February 26, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.
13
REFERRED TO ADR
COMPLETED BY:
January 31, 2018
14
FOR COURT MEDIATION TO BE
LAST DAY TO JOIN PARTIES OR AMEND PLEADINGS:
Only with Court Approval
16
NON-EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:
December 8, 2017
17
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERTS (RETAINED/NONRETAINED):
Opening: January 12, 2018
Rebuttal: January 26, 2018
EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF:
February 9, 2018
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS1 / DAUBERT MOTIONS To BE
HEARD BY:
On 35 day notice; filed by 3/13/18
COMPLIANCE HEARING (SEE PAGE 2)
Friday, April 27, 2018 at 9:01 a.m.
JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE STATEMENT:
April 20, 2018
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE:
Friday, May 4, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.
TRIAL DATE AND LENGTH:
Monday, May 14, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. for 2
days (Jury Trial)
15
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1
28
See Standing Order regarding Pre-filing Conference Requirements for motions for
summary judgment.
1
Pursuant to the Court’s Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases at Section 2, trial counsel shall meet
2
and confer in advance of the Pretrial Conference. The compliance hearing on Friday, April 27,
3
2018 at 9:01 a.m. is intended to confirm that counsel have reviewed the Court’s Pretrial Setting
4
Instructions and are in compliance therewith. The compliance hearing shall be held in the Federal
5
Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, in Courtroom 1. Five (5) business days prior
6
to the date of the compliance hearing, the parties shall file a one-page JOINT STATEMENT
7
confirming they have complied with this requirement or explaining their failure to comply. If
8
compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off
9
calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
in a timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in sanctions.
The parties must comply with both the Court’s Standing Order in Civil Cases and Standing
12
Order for Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases for additional deadlines and procedures. All
13
Standing Orders are available on the Court’s website at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygrorders.
14
15
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 14, 2017
______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Court Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?