Naggie v. City of San Francisco et al

Filing 9

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING FAILURE TO FILE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 1/20/2017 09:01 AM. Show Cause Response due by 1/13/2017. The Court VACATES the case management conference currently set for 1/9/2017. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/4/17. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2017)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

ANGELA NAGGIE,

Case No. 16-cv-05767-YGR

Plaintiff,
5
v.
6
7

CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL.,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING
FAILURE TO FILE CASE MANAGEMENT
STATEMENT

Defendants.
8
Plaintiff initiated this action on October 6, 2016. (Dkt. No. 1.) On October 7, 2016, the

10

Court set a case management conference for January 9, 2017. The Court also indicated that the

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

9

parties must file a case management statement by January 2, 2017. As of today, plaintiff has not

12

filed such statement, in contravention to the Court’s scheduling order, the Local Rules of this

13

District, and the Court’s Standing Order.1
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE explaining why her case should not be

14
15

dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Court SETS a hearing on this Order for Friday, January

16

20, 2017 at 9:01 a.m. in the Federal Building, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, Courtroom

17

1. By January 13, 2017, plaintiff shall file a statement explaining her failure to file a case

18

management statement. If the Court is satisfied with plaintiff’s submission, the Court may vacate

19

the hearing on this Order and plaintiff need not appear. Otherwise, plaintiff must appear

20

personally at the hearing and telephonic appearances will not be permitted.
The Court further VACATES the case management conference currently set for January 9,

21
22
23
24

2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 4, 2017

25

______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

26
27
1

28

The Court also notes that plaintiff has yet to serve defendants in this action.