Nelson v. Aetna Life Insurance Company

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL, ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/20/17. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 DANIEL S. GLASS SBN 140819 ATTORNEY AT LAW 641 Fulton Ave., Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825 (916) 483-1971 Facsimile: (916) 483-1371 e-mail: dsglawyer@sbcglobal.net ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF KAREN NELSON 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 KAREN NELSON, Plaintiff, 12 13 AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; 15 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER v. 14 CASE NO. 4:16-cv-05865-YGR Defendant. ________________________________/ 16 17 Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties, by 18 and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that this action shall be 19 DISMISSED in its entirety WITH PREJUDICE, with each side bearing its own attorney 20 fees and costs. 21 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 22 Dated: June 20, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 23 /s/ Jordan S. Altura /s/ Daniel S. Glass 24 Gordon & Rees, LLP 275 Battery St., Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Daniel S. Glass Attorney at Law 641 Fulton Ave., Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825 Attorney for Plaintiff 25 26 Attorneys for Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER -1- ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE 1 2 3 4 I, Daniel S. Glass, am the ECF user for whose ID and password are being used to file this document. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(I), I hereby attest that counsel for defendant has concurred in this filing. 5 June 20, 2017 6 _____/s/ Daniel S. Glass_____ Daniel S. Glass 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 12 Dated: June 20, 2017 ____________________________________ Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers United States District Court Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND PROPOSED ORDER -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?