Eric Eugene Smith v. Timothy Friederichs et al
Filing
62
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/10/18. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
XAVIER BECERRA
Attorney General of California
JOHN P. DEVINE
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
ROSAILDA PEREZ
Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 284646
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: (415) 703-1618
Fax: (415) 703-5480
E-mail: Rosailda.Perez@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
JAMES D. HORNBUCKLE
Cornerstone Law Corporation
State Bar No. 230407
18000 Studebaker Rd., Suite 700
Cerritos, CA 90703
Telephone: (888)-990-1211
Fax: (888) 990-1213
E-mail: jdh@cornerstonelawcorp.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
ERIC EUGENE SMITH,
16CV06203-YGR
13
Plaintiff, JUDGMENT
14
v.
15
16
TIMOTHY FRIEDERICHS, et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
19
Pursuant to the Court’s Order filed on January 4, 2018, granting the Motion for Summary
20
Judgment filed by defendants Timothy Friederichs, M.D., the California State Department of
21
Rehabilitation Correctional Training Facility, and the California Department of Corrections and
22
Rehabilitations (collectively, “Defendants”), the Court enters judgment for Defendants and
23
against Plaintiff Eric Eugene Smith.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated: ________10, 2018
January
__________________________
HON. YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
United States District Court Judge
27
28
1
Judgment in Favor of Defendants Following Grant of Summary Judgment (16CV06203-YGR)
1
2
3
4
Approved as to form:
/s/ James D. Hornbuckle1
JAMES D. HORNBUCKLE
Attorney for Plaintiff
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
I, Rosailda Perez, attest that I the concurrence of James D. Hornbuckle in the filing of
this judgment and that I will keep confirm records. /s/ Rosailda Perez
2
Judgment in Favor of Defendants Following Grant of Summary Judgment (16CV06203-YGR)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?