Davis v. RBC Capital Markets, LLC

Filing 27

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 26 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6

KATHRYN BURKETT DICKSON (STATE BAR NO. 70636)
[e-mail]
EMILY A. NUGENT (STATE BAR NO. 255048)
[e-mail]
DICKSON GEESMAN LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2000
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Celeste Davis

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

ERIN M. CONNELL (STATE BAR NO. 223355)
[e-mail]
KATHRYN G. MANTOAN (STATE BAR NO. 239649)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
RBC Capital Markets, LLC

14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
Celeste Davis,

Case No. 3:16-CV-06263-HSG

20
Plaintiff,
21

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
PRIVATE MEDIATION

v.
22
23
24

RBC Capital Markets, LLC; and DOES 1 to
100, Inclusive,
Defendants.

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR PRIVATE MEDIATION
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-06263-HSG

1
2

Plaintiff Celeste Davis and Defendant RBC Capital M
D
C
Markets, LLC (collectivel “the
C
ly,
Pa
arties”), by and through their respect counsel, hereby stip
a
t
tive
,
pulate as follo
ows:

3

WHER
REAS the Pa
arties already participate in one mediation prior to litigation
y
ed
r
n;

4

WHER
REAS the Pa
arties held an ADR telep
n
phone confer
rence with th Court’s A
he
ADR staff on

5

May 2, 2017, during which they discu
M
ussed ADR o
options to sat
tisfy the Cou
urt’s ADR re
equirement;

6

WHER
REAS, the Parties expres
ssed their mu
utual agreem to medi with the Honorable
ment
iate
e

7

St
teven A. Bric (Ret.) in an effort to resolve their dispute afte sufficient discovery ha taken
ck
a
r
r
er
as

8

pla
ace;

9
10
11
12

Now, therefore, the Parties through their re
t
espective co
ounsel, stipul as follow
late
ws:
1.

The Parties agree to me
s
ediate before the Honora Steven A Brick (Re in the
e
able
A.
et.)

Sa Francisco Bay Area;
an
2.

The Parties will work in good faith to complete the mediation within 9 days of
s
h
e
90

13

the date of the Court’s ord
e
e
der.

14

Da
ated: May 9, 2017

DICKSON GEESMAN LLP
N

15
16

By:

17
18
19

ated: May 9, 2017
Da

/s/ Kathryn Bu
/
urkett Dickso
on
KA
ATHRYN BU
URKETT DI
ICKSON
Attorney for Plainti
ys
iff
Cele Davis
este

ORRICK, H
HERRINGT
TON & SUTC
CLIFFE
LLP

20
21
/ Erin Con
/s/
nnell
ERIN M CONNEL
M.
LL
Attorneys for Defend
s
dant
RBC Capit Markets, LLC
tal

By:
22
23
24

URSUANT TO STIPUL
LATION, IT IS SO OR
I
RDERED.
PU

25
26

Da
ated: May 10, 2017
1

By:
HON HAYWO
N.
OOD S. GILL
LIAM, JR.
United Stat District J
tes
Judge

27
28
-1-

ST
TIPULATION AND [PROPO
OSED] ORDER
R
F
FOR PRIVATE MEDIATION
E
N
CA NO. 3:16-C
ASE
CV-06263-HSG
G

1
2
3

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE
Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR PRIVATE MEDIATION
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-06263-HSG