Davis v. RBC Capital Markets, LLC
Filing
29
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 28 Stipulation RE Private ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
KATHRYN BURKETT DICKSON (STATE BAR NO. 70636)
kathy@discksongeesman.com
EMILY A. NUGENT (STATE BAR NO. 255048)
emily@dicksongeesman.com
DICKSON GEESMAN LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2000
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: (510) 899-46700
Fax: (510) 899-4671
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Celeste Davis
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
ERIN M. CONNELL (STATE BAR NO. 223355)
econnell@orrick.com
KATHRYN G. MANTOAN (STATE BAR NO. 239649)
kmantoan@orrick.com
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
Telephone:
+1 415 773 5700
Facsimile:
+1 415 773 5759
Attorneys for Defendant
RBC Capital Markets, LLC
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
Celeste Davis,
Case No. 4:16-CV-06263-HSG
20
Plaintiff,
21
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR PRIVATE MEDIATION
v.
22
23
24
RBC Capital Markets, LLC; and DOES 1 to
100, Inclusive,
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR PRIVATE MEDIATION
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06263-HSG
1
2
Plaintiff Celeste Davis and Defendant RBC Capital Markets, LLC (collectively, “the
Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
3
WHEREAS the Parties already participated in one mediation prior to litigation;
4
WHEREAS the Parties held an ADR telephone conference with the Court’s ADR staff on
5
May 2, 2017, during which they discussed ADR options to satisfy the Court’s ADR requirement;
6
WHEREAS, the Parties expressed their mutual agreement to mediate with the Honorable
7
Steven A. Brick (Ret.) in an effort to resolve their dispute after sufficient discovery has taken
8
place;
9
10
WHEREAS on May 10, 2017 the Court ordered the parties to mediate before the
Honorable Steven A. Brick (Ret.) in the San Francisco Bay Area within 90 days;
11
12
WHEREAS the Honorable Steven A. Brick (Ret.) recently and unexpectedly passed away
resulting in the parties’ need to find a new mediator to conduct the court-ordered mediation;
13
14
WHEREAS, the Parties agreed to mediate with Patricia Gillette, Esq. of JAMS on
September 25, 2017 in an effort to resolve their dispute;
15
Now, therefore, the Parties through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows:
16
1.
The Parties agree to mediate before Patricia Gillette, Esq. in the San Francisco Bay
2.
The Parties have scheduled a mediation date with Ms. Gillette on September 25,
17
18
Area;
19
2017 and will work in good faith to complete the mediation and any follow-up from the
20
mediation no later than October 31, 2017.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR PRIVATE MEDIATION
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06263-HSG
1
Dated: August 2, 2017
DICKSON GEESMAN LLP
2
3
By:
4
5
6
Dated: August 2, 2017
/s/ Kathryn Burkett Dickson
KATHRYN BURKETT DICKSON
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Celeste Davis
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
LLP
7
8
By:
/s/ Erin Connell
ERIN M. CONNELL
Attorneys for Defendant
RBC Capital Markets, LLC
9
10
11
12
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
The deadline for completion of ADR is continued to October 31, 2017.
13
14
Dated: ___________, 2017
August 2
By:
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
N
M JR
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE
Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR PRIVATE MEDIATION
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06263-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?