Davis v. RBC Capital Markets, LLC

Filing 29

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 28 Stipulation RE Private ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 KATHRYN BURKETT DICKSON (STATE BAR NO. 70636) kathy@discksongeesman.com EMILY A. NUGENT (STATE BAR NO. 255048) emily@dicksongeesman.com DICKSON GEESMAN LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2000 Oakland, CA 94612 Tel: (510) 899-46700 Fax: (510) 899-4671 Attorneys for Plaintiff Celeste Davis 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ERIN M. CONNELL (STATE BAR NO. 223355) econnell@orrick.com KATHRYN G. MANTOAN (STATE BAR NO. 239649) kmantoan@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 Telephone: +1 415 773 5700 Facsimile: +1 415 773 5759 Attorneys for Defendant RBC Capital Markets, LLC 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 Celeste Davis, Case No. 4:16-CV-06263-HSG 20 Plaintiff, 21 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PRIVATE MEDIATION v. 22 23 24 RBC Capital Markets, LLC; and DOES 1 to 100, Inclusive, Defendants. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PRIVATE MEDIATION CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06263-HSG 1 2 Plaintiff Celeste Davis and Defendant RBC Capital Markets, LLC (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 3 WHEREAS the Parties already participated in one mediation prior to litigation; 4 WHEREAS the Parties held an ADR telephone conference with the Court’s ADR staff on 5 May 2, 2017, during which they discussed ADR options to satisfy the Court’s ADR requirement; 6 WHEREAS, the Parties expressed their mutual agreement to mediate with the Honorable 7 Steven A. Brick (Ret.) in an effort to resolve their dispute after sufficient discovery has taken 8 place; 9 10 WHEREAS on May 10, 2017 the Court ordered the parties to mediate before the Honorable Steven A. Brick (Ret.) in the San Francisco Bay Area within 90 days; 11 12 WHEREAS the Honorable Steven A. Brick (Ret.) recently and unexpectedly passed away resulting in the parties’ need to find a new mediator to conduct the court-ordered mediation; 13 14 WHEREAS, the Parties agreed to mediate with Patricia Gillette, Esq. of JAMS on September 25, 2017 in an effort to resolve their dispute; 15 Now, therefore, the Parties through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: 16 1. The Parties agree to mediate before Patricia Gillette, Esq. in the San Francisco Bay 2. The Parties have scheduled a mediation date with Ms. Gillette on September 25, 17 18 Area; 19 2017 and will work in good faith to complete the mediation and any follow-up from the 20 mediation no later than October 31, 2017. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PRIVATE MEDIATION CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06263-HSG 1 Dated: August 2, 2017 DICKSON GEESMAN LLP 2 3 By: 4 5 6 Dated: August 2, 2017 /s/ Kathryn Burkett Dickson KATHRYN BURKETT DICKSON Attorneys for Plaintiff Celeste Davis ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 7 8 By: /s/ Erin Connell ERIN M. CONNELL Attorneys for Defendant RBC Capital Markets, LLC 9 10 11 12 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The deadline for completion of ADR is continued to October 31, 2017. 13 14 Dated: ___________, 2017 August 2 By: HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. N M JR United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PRIVATE MEDIATION CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06263-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?