Davis v. RBC Capital Markets, LLC

Filing 31

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 30 Stipulation for Fact Discovery Extension. Close of Fact Discovery due by 12/6/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 KATHRYN BURKETT DICKSON (STATE BAR NO. 70636) kathy@discksongeesman.com EMILY A. NUGENT (STATE BAR NO. 255048) emily@dicksongeesman.com DICKSON GEESMAN LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2000 Oakland, CA 94612 Tel: (510) 899-46700 Fax: (510) 899-4671 Attorneys for Plaintiff Celeste Davis 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ERIN M. CONNELL (STATE BAR NO. 223355) econnell@orrick.com KATHRYN G. MANTOAN (STATE BAR NO. 239649) kmantoan@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 Telephone: +1 415 773 5700 Facsimile: +1 415 773 5759 Attorneys for Defendant RBC Capital Markets, LLC 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 Celeste Davis, Case No. 4:16-CV-06263-HSG 20 Plaintiff, 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FACT DISCOVERY EXTENSION v. 22 23 24 RBC Capital Markets, LLC; and DOES 1 to 100, Inclusive, Defendants. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FACT DISCOVERY EXTENSION CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06263-HSG 1 2 Plaintiff Celeste Davis and Defendant RBC Capital Markets, LLC (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 3 4 WHEREAS the Court’s Scheduling Order entered on March 6, 2017 (Dkt. No. 23) sets the close of fact discovery for October 6, 2017; 5 WHEREAS the trial date in this matter is set for May 14, 2018; 6 WHEREAS the Parties already participated in one mediation prior to litigation; 7 WHEREAS on May 10, 2017 the Court ordered the parties to mediate before the 8 Honorable Steven A. Brick (Ret.) in the San Francisco Bay Area within 90 days; 9 10 WHEREAS the Honorable Steven A. Brick (Ret.) recently and unexpectedly passed away resulting in the parties’ need to find a new mediator to conduct the court-ordered mediation; 11 12 WHEREAS the Parties agreed to mediate with Patricia Gillette, Esq. of JAMS on September 25, 2017 in an effort to resolve their dispute; 13 14 WHEREAS on August 2, 2017 the Court ordered the deadline for completion of ADR continued to October 31, 2017; 15 16 WHEREAS if the Parties do not resolve the case through mediation, they anticipate the need for additional discovery, including depositions; 17 18 WHEREAS the Parties agree to mutually extend the close of fact discovery to avoid the cost of further discovery pre-mediation; 19 Now, therefore, the Parties through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: 20 1. The Parties agree to continue the close of fact discovery until December 6, 2017. 21 2. All other deadlines from the Court’s Scheduling Order (Dkt. 23) will remain the 22 same. 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FACT DISCOVERY EXTENSION CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06263-HSG 1 Da ated: Septem mber 7, 2017 7 N DICKSON GEESMAN LLP 2 3 By: 4 5 6 Da ated: Septem mber 7, 2017 7 / ickson /s/ Kathryn Di KA ATHRYN BU URKETT DI ICKSON Attorney for Plainti ys iff Cele Davis este ORRICK, H HERRINGT TON & SUTC CLIFFE LLP 7 8 By: / Erin Con /s/ nnell ERIN M CONNEL M. LL Attorneys for Defend s dant RBC Capit Markets, LLC tal 9 10 11 12 URSUANT TO STIPUL LATION, IT IS SO OR I RDERED. PU The cl lose of fact discovery is continued t Decembe 6, 2017. d to er 13 14 Da ated: Septem mber 7, 2017 7 By: HON HAYWO N. OOD S. GILL LIAM, JR. United Stat District J tes Judge 15 16 17 18 19 ATTESTA ATION OF CONCUR F RRENCE Pursua to N.D. Cal. Civil Lo Rule 5-1 ant C ocal 1(i)(3), the fi attests th concurren in the filer hat nce fil ling of this document has been obtain from ea ch of the abo signator d ned ove ries. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- STIPULATIO AND ORDER FOR FACT ON T DISCOVERY EXTENSION Y N CA NO. 4:16-C ASE CV-06263-HSG G

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?