Davis v. RBC Capital Markets, LLC
Filing
31
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 30 Stipulation for Fact Discovery Extension. Close of Fact Discovery due by 12/6/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
KATHRYN BURKETT DICKSON (STATE BAR NO. 70636)
kathy@discksongeesman.com
EMILY A. NUGENT (STATE BAR NO. 255048)
emily@dicksongeesman.com
DICKSON GEESMAN LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2000
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: (510) 899-46700
Fax: (510) 899-4671
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Celeste Davis
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
ERIN M. CONNELL (STATE BAR NO. 223355)
econnell@orrick.com
KATHRYN G. MANTOAN (STATE BAR NO. 239649)
kmantoan@orrick.com
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
Telephone:
+1 415 773 5700
Facsimile:
+1 415 773 5759
Attorneys for Defendant
RBC Capital Markets, LLC
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
Celeste Davis,
Case No. 4:16-CV-06263-HSG
20
Plaintiff,
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
FACT DISCOVERY EXTENSION
v.
22
23
24
RBC Capital Markets, LLC; and DOES 1 to
100, Inclusive,
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FACT
DISCOVERY EXTENSION
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06263-HSG
1
2
Plaintiff Celeste Davis and Defendant RBC Capital Markets, LLC (collectively, “the
Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
3
4
WHEREAS the Court’s Scheduling Order entered on March 6, 2017 (Dkt. No. 23) sets the
close of fact discovery for October 6, 2017;
5
WHEREAS the trial date in this matter is set for May 14, 2018;
6
WHEREAS the Parties already participated in one mediation prior to litigation;
7
WHEREAS on May 10, 2017 the Court ordered the parties to mediate before the
8
Honorable Steven A. Brick (Ret.) in the San Francisco Bay Area within 90 days;
9
10
WHEREAS the Honorable Steven A. Brick (Ret.) recently and unexpectedly passed away
resulting in the parties’ need to find a new mediator to conduct the court-ordered mediation;
11
12
WHEREAS the Parties agreed to mediate with Patricia Gillette, Esq. of JAMS on
September 25, 2017 in an effort to resolve their dispute;
13
14
WHEREAS on August 2, 2017 the Court ordered the deadline for completion of ADR
continued to October 31, 2017;
15
16
WHEREAS if the Parties do not resolve the case through mediation, they anticipate the
need for additional discovery, including depositions;
17
18
WHEREAS the Parties agree to mutually extend the close of fact discovery to avoid the
cost of further discovery pre-mediation;
19
Now, therefore, the Parties through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows:
20
1.
The Parties agree to continue the close of fact discovery until December 6, 2017.
21
2.
All other deadlines from the Court’s Scheduling Order (Dkt. 23) will remain the
22
same.
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FACT
DISCOVERY EXTENSION
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06263-HSG
1
Da
ated: Septem
mber 7, 2017
7
N
DICKSON GEESMAN LLP
2
3
By:
4
5
6
Da
ated: Septem
mber 7, 2017
7
/
ickson
/s/ Kathryn Di
KA
ATHRYN BU
URKETT DI
ICKSON
Attorney for Plainti
ys
iff
Cele Davis
este
ORRICK, H
HERRINGT
TON & SUTC
CLIFFE
LLP
7
8
By:
/ Erin Con
/s/
nnell
ERIN M CONNEL
M.
LL
Attorneys for Defend
s
dant
RBC Capit Markets, LLC
tal
9
10
11
12
URSUANT TO STIPUL
LATION, IT IS SO OR
I
RDERED.
PU
The cl
lose of fact discovery is continued t Decembe 6, 2017.
d
to
er
13
14
Da
ated: Septem
mber 7, 2017
7
By:
HON HAYWO
N.
OOD S. GILL
LIAM, JR.
United Stat District J
tes
Judge
15
16
17
18
19
ATTESTA
ATION OF CONCUR
F
RRENCE
Pursua to N.D. Cal. Civil Lo Rule 5-1
ant
C
ocal
1(i)(3), the fi attests th concurren in the
filer
hat
nce
fil
ling of this document has been obtain from ea ch of the abo signator
d
ned
ove
ries.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
STIPULATIO AND ORDER FOR FACT
ON
T
DISCOVERY EXTENSION
Y
N
CA NO. 4:16-C
ASE
CV-06263-HSG
G
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?