Davis v. RBC Capital Markets, LLC
Filing
33
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 32 Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
KATHRYN BURKETT DICKSON (STATE BAR NO. 70636)
kathy@discksongeesman.com
EMILY A. NUGENT (STATE BAR NO. 255048)
emily@dicksongeesman.com
DICKSON GEESMAN LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2000
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: (510) 899-46700
Fax: (510) 899-4671
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Celeste Davis
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
ERIN M. CONNELL (STATE BAR NO. 223355)
econnell@orrick.com
KATHRYN G. MANTOAN (STATE BAR NO. 239649)
kmantoan@orrick.com
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
The Orrick Building
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
Telephone:
+1 415 773 5700
Facsimile:
+1 415 773 5759
Attorneys for Defendant
RBC Capital Markets, LLC
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
Celeste Davis,
Case No. 3:16-CV-06263-HSG
20
Plaintiff,
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
v.
22
23
24
RBC Capital Markets, LLC; and DOES 1 to
100, Inclusive,
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-06263-HSG
1
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and Civil Local Rule 7-12,
2
Plaintiff Celeste Davis and Defendant RBC Capital Markets, LLC (collectively, “the Parties”), by
3
and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
4
WHEREAS Plaintiff initiated this action against Defendant on September 27, 2016
5
alleging claims of discrimination, retaliation, failure to prevent discrimination, and violation of
6
the California Fair Pay Act in San Francisco Superior Court;
7
WHEREAS Defendant timely removed to this Court on October 28, 2016; and
8
WHEREAS, the Parties engaged in mediation with Patricia Gillette, Esq. on September
9
10
25, 2017 and agreed on a resolution of this matter in its entirety;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Celeste Davis and RBC
11
Capital Markets, LLC that this action shall be dismissed with prejudice with each party bearing
12
its own attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses.
13
14
Dated: December 12, 2017
DICKSON GEESMAN LLP
15
By:
16
17
/s/ Kathryn Dickson
KATHRYN BURKETT DICKSON
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Celeste Davis
18
Dated: December 12, 2017
19
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
LLP
20
21
By:
22
23
/s/ Erin Connell
ERIN M. CONNELL
Attorneys for Defendant
RBC Capital Markets, LLC
ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE
24
Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the
25
filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.
26
27
28
-1-
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-06263-HSG
1
PU
URSUANT TO STIPUL
LATION, IT IS SO OR
I
RDERED.
2
ated: Decem
mber 13, 2017
Da
By:
3
HON HAYWO
N.
OOD S. GILL
LIAM, JR.
United Stat District J
tes
Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
STIPU
ULATION AND ORDER FOR
D
R
DISM
MISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
H
E
CASE NO. 3:16-C
CV-06263-HSG
G
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?