Marino v. CAcafe, Inc. et al

Filing 113

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' Request to Compel Further Responses re 112 Discovery Letter Brief. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 LEONA MARINO, Case No. 16-cv-6291 YGR Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES 11 United States District Court Northern District of California v. 12 13 CACAFE, INC., ET AL., Re: Dkt. No. 112 Defendants. 14 15 The Court has reviewed the parties’ joint discovery letter brief, filed November 27, 2017. 16 (Dkt. No. 112, “Brief”.) Based upon the arguments therein and the record in this action, the Court 17 Orders that Plaintiff’s request to compel further responses is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN 18 PART, as follows: 19 Plaintiff provides no justification for the 8-month delay in addressing the alleged 20 inadequacy of defendant's document production. Accordingly, to the extent the letter brief seeks 21 an extension on class certification briefing, such request is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to a 22 more substantial showing of good cause. 23 24 25 Plaintiff’s request is GRANTED IN PART as to the following information (identified at Brief 3:19-4:3) for all putative class members, specifically: 1. All emails dated between February 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016, in all four of the 26 referenced email accounts, containing one of the 48 modified search terms in either the email’s 27 body or subject line, for all emails between: (i) CACafe, Costco, and/or CDS; and (ii) plaintiff 28 and/or any ISD within the class definition. 1 2. All emails in which “Costco” or “CDS” is part of the recipient and/or sender email 2 address, and the email relates to: (i) the demonstration agreements and services between CACafe, 3 Costco, and CDS; and (ii) the policies/procedures of CACafe, Costco, and/or CDS. 4 The Court ORDERS CACafe to produce the above documents by December 22, 2017, or 5 the promised date, whichever is sooner. However, CACafe is not required to produce any 6 responsive documents comprising earnings/commissions statements, payroll records, or similar 7 financial information of putative class members who have not opted-in to the FLSA collective 8 action by the date of production. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 The demand for emails between CACafe and unnamed third party companies, such as Walmart, is DENIED. This Order is without prejudice to any request to compel production of the requested information should a class be certified. 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 This terminates Docket No. 112. 15 16 17 Dated: November 30, 2017 ______________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?